From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jan 21 05:11:45 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1D52C16A4CE for ; Wed, 21 Jan 2004 05:11:45 -0800 (PST) Received: from postman.arcor.de (postman2.arcor-online.net [151.189.0.188]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2B8E543D2F for ; Wed, 21 Jan 2004 05:11:12 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from eikemeier@fillmore-labs.com) Received: from fillmore.dyndns.org (port-212-202-51-21.reverse.qsc.de [212.202.51.21]) (authenticated bits=0)i0LDB8gG020460 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=EDH-RSA-DES-CBC3-SHA bits=168 verify=NO); Wed, 21 Jan 2004 14:11:09 +0100 (MET) Received: from [172.16.0.2] (helo=fillmore-labs.com) by fillmore.dyndns.org with esmtp (TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.30; FreeBSD) id 1AjI8S-000L6d-KG; Wed, 21 Jan 2004 14:11:08 +0100 Message-ID: <400E7A65.2030007@fillmore-labs.com> Date: Wed, 21 Jan 2004 14:11:01 +0100 From: Oliver Eikemeier Organization: Fillmore Labs GmbH - http://www.fillmore-labs.com/ MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Dirk Meyer References: <20040120133020.GB94636@FreeBSD.org> <1074590694.85583.20.camel@shumai.marcuscom.com> <400D2939.5090203@fillmore-labs.com> <20040120133020.GB94636@FreeBSD.org> <400D344B.6010403@fillmore-labs.com> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit User-Agent: KMail/1.5.9 cc: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: HEADS UP: New bsd.*.mk changes X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 21 Jan 2004 13:11:45 -0000 Dirk Meyer wrote: > Oliver Eikemeier schrieb:, > > >>The problem with the current solution is that renaming OPTIONSFILE is not >>easy, because ${PORT_DBDIR}/${PORTNAME} is somewhat hardcoded in bsd.port.mk >>now. I can change PORT_DBDIR, but have to accept ${PORT_DBDIR}/${PORTNAME}, >>which is bad. Perhaps we should have >>OPTIONSFILE?=${PORT_DBDIR}/${LATEST_LINK}.options, >>which is easier to change. > > > Why no using it really foolproof: > OPTIONSFILE?=${PORT_DBDIR}/${PKGCATEGORY}-${PORTNAME}.options - won't survive moved ports (e.g. net/bind9 => dns/bind9) - is not unique (e.g. www-apache.options)