From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Feb 26 12:45:05 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 46BDE1065678 for ; Sun, 26 Feb 2012 12:45:05 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd-stable@m.gmane.org) Received: from plane.gmane.org (plane.gmane.org [80.91.229.3]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 020B48FC13 for ; Sun, 26 Feb 2012 12:45:04 +0000 (UTC) Received: from list by plane.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1S1dTL-0001fw-Hm for freebsd-stable@freebsd.org; Sun, 26 Feb 2012 13:45:03 +0100 Received: from np-19-75.prenet.pl ([np-19-75.prenet.pl]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Sun, 26 Feb 2012 13:45:03 +0100 Received: from jb.1234abcd by np-19-75.prenet.pl with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Sun, 26 Feb 2012 13:45:03 +0100 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org From: jb Date: Sun, 26 Feb 2012 12:42:55 +0000 (UTC) Lines: 24 Message-ID: References: <4F46847D.4010908@my.gd> <201202261630.57372.erichfreebsdlist@ovitrap.com> <4F4A068B.2090807@hm.net.br> <201202261800.16269.erichfreebsdlist@ovitrap.com> <4F4A254E.60200@hm.net.br> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: sea.gmane.org User-Agent: Loom/3.14 (http://gmane.org/) X-Loom-IP: 79.139.19.75 (Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD i386; rv:9.0.1) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/9.0.1) Subject: Re: FreeBSD9 and the sheer number of problem reports X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 26 Feb 2012 12:45:05 -0000 H hm.net.br> writes: > ... > it is about FreeBSD and the meaning, importance and reliability of > -RELEASE for all people > ... > > Still, FreeBSD has always at least one more release out there which > > was hardened in real life. > > ... Hi, I think you have a point. There was a very interesting discussion on "FreeBSD and release engineering". http://lwn.net/Articles/478663/ There were some proposals made, but in my view this is the most important one. There are too many "production releases" - at present including versions 7.4, 8.2, and 9.0 . Cutting one would refocus devs and users on the remainig two, with obvious benefits to FreeBSD product. jb