From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue May 2 10:10:21 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 87A3116A441 for ; Tue, 2 May 2006 10:10:21 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from willay@gmail.com) Received: from nproxy.gmail.com (nproxy.gmail.com [64.233.182.186]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9ECB343D68 for ; Tue, 2 May 2006 10:10:16 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from willay@gmail.com) Received: by nproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id m18so618752nfc for ; Tue, 02 May 2006 03:10:15 -0700 (PDT) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=tEoxMMi/Vw7n4zGrXkumDwEt+V5CNdTXTE9NVOz5p9V0zPHncINzYlJ5aceT4T6EiwReBCwVyQQVjk12OwvLu1aT2Tg6sbnuIElUf3c9QYdrfB0TLpf3OaZS2cRi/J4MlooeWLPdd4vyfVPZGWIHSIUqYNvq1ANI8urraEc80H4= Received: by 10.49.49.19 with SMTP id b19mr371567nfk; Tue, 02 May 2006 03:10:15 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.48.48.15 with HTTP; Tue, 2 May 2006 03:10:15 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: Date: Tue, 2 May 2006 11:10:15 +0100 From: William To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org In-Reply-To: <002a01c66c66$798b63c0$dededede@avalon.lan> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline References: <002a01c66c66$798b63c0$dededede@avalon.lan> Subject: Re: FreeBSD 6.0 compat with DL320 G4 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 02 May 2006 10:10:22 -0000 What was your experience like with 6.0-RELEASE and the dl320 g4? I've had a quote back on that model so could be near to actually getting some hardware for once :) On 30/04/06, No@SPAM@mgEDV.net wrote: > > just for info: our dl320 g4 also has bge interfaces, and > they work very well under 6.1-RC1 (even BETA4 was ok). > but our server has been bought 2 months ago, maybe there's > a newer/different chipset in it. > we also have a dl320 g2 being heavily used as lan switches > monitor, this server also has bge interfaces and had no > problem since 1 year capturing and analyzing more than > 26GB/day (avg) of nw-data on the 2nd interface and serving > more than 4GB/day (avg) on the primary one (both IPv4 only). > > c ya ;-) > >