From owner-freebsd-security  Sun Mar  4  5:34: 1 2001
Delivered-To: freebsd-security@freebsd.org
Received: from office.admaster.pl (office.admaster.pl [212.160.251.44])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AACE637B718
	for <freebsd-security@freebsd.org>; Sun,  4 Mar 2001 05:33:51 -0800 (PST)
	(envelope-from s.zak@admaster.pl)
Received: by office.admaster.pl (Postfix, from userid 1001)
	id AC0FE85BE8; Sun,  4 Mar 2001 14:33:32 +0100 (CET)
From: Slawek Zak <zaks@prioris.mini.pw.edu.pl>
To: freebsd-security@freebsd.org
Subject: Source address spec. for inetd.conf
Date: 04 Mar 2001 14:33:32 +0100
Message-ID: <86ofvh8xqr.fsf@office.admaster.pl>
Lines: 14
User-Agent: Gnus/5.090001 (Oort Gnus v0.01) XEmacs/21.1 (GTK)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Sender: owner-freebsd-security@FreeBSD.ORG
Precedence: bulk
X-Loop: FreeBSD.org

What do you think of adding separate source address specification for
daemons run from inetd?

Something like:

        <hostname|ip>:service ...

in OpenBSD.

It would save some peple (including me) packet filter configuration on
multihomed machines in many cases.

/S


To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-security" in the body of the message