From owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Sun Oct 25 19:47:42 2020 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3B4E7456EED for ; Sun, 25 Oct 2020 19:47:42 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from 4250.82.1d4c5000500c195.57cc7f0146846d38d71ea64aa1aec767@email-od.com) Received: from s1-b0c6.socketlabs.email-od.com (s1-b0c6.socketlabs.email-od.com [142.0.176.198]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4CK7mD68Gpz4RvW for ; Sun, 25 Oct 2020 19:47:40 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from 4250.82.1d4c5000500c195.57cc7f0146846d38d71ea64aa1aec767@email-od.com) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=email-od.com;i=@email-od.com;s=dkim; c=relaxed/relaxed; q=dns/txt; t=1603655256; x=1606247256; h=content-transfer-encoding:content-type:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:message-id:subject:to:from:date:x-thread-info; bh=2MpxqReD6DIBIop4NYZNSzhv7DC+AV8f+zlNA85kJLg=; b=D6XTIlerkoPo+KnxYVj/vhCjgo3FlE+e9xg/LkfrLzEHC8DhTggN/12vNwZGtfyZFn79GsJ1cJbfp+aYgPiYtDYxm5XPXqRrrQawkWGve1i7hl23gRhYs8KKuFzyyJJhZoLydnlOJj2n8UNyEnJykM+FS7UCnqk1uiCzjUvBJ+8= X-Thread-Info: NDI1MC45Mi4xZDRjNTAwMDUwMGMxOTUuZnJlZWJzZC1xdWVzdGlvbnM9ZnJlZWJzZC5vcmc= Received: from r3.us-east-1.aws.in.socketlabs.com (r3.us-east-1.aws.in.socketlabs.com [142.0.191.3]) by mxsg2.email-od.com with ESMTP(version=Tls12 cipher=Aes256 bits=256); Sun, 25 Oct 2020 15:47:29 -0400 Received: from smtp.lan.sohara.org (EMTPY [185.202.17.215]) by r3.us-east-1.aws.in.socketlabs.com with ESMTP(version=Tls12 cipher=Aes256 bits=256); Sun, 25 Oct 2020 15:46:55 -0400 Received: from [192.168.63.1] (helo=steve.lan.sohara.org) by smtp.lan.sohara.org with smtp (Exim 4.94 (FreeBSD)) (envelope-from ) id 1kWlzI-000JLq-Jj for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Sun, 25 Oct 2020 19:47:32 +0000 Date: Sun, 25 Oct 2020 19:47:32 +0000 From: Steve O'Hara-Smith To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: What is the "better / best " method to multi-boot different OSes natively WITHOUT VirtualBox(es) ? Message-Id: <20201025194732.89b4baab79673a434df7cdcb@sohara.org> In-Reply-To: <20201025065025.6a13dc89@archlinux> References: <20201024111010.5c867e8540a369b826d26703@sohara.org> <20201025065025.6a13dc89@archlinux> X-Mailer: Sylpheed 3.7.0 (GTK+ 2.24.32; amd64-portbld-freebsd12.0) X-Clacks-Overhead: "GNU Terry Pratchett" Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 4CK7mD68Gpz4RvW X-Spamd-Bar: / Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; dkim=pass header.d=email-od.com header.s=dkim header.b=D6XTIler; dmarc=none; spf=pass (mx1.freebsd.org: domain of 4250.82.1d4c5000500c195.57cc7f0146846d38d71ea64aa1aec767@email-od.com designates 142.0.176.198 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=4250.82.1d4c5000500c195.57cc7f0146846d38d71ea64aa1aec767@email-od.com X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-0.99 / 15.00]; RCVD_TLS_LAST(0.00)[]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; R_DKIM_ALLOW(-0.20)[email-od.com:s=dkim]; MID_RHS_MATCH_FROM(0.00)[]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; RWL_MAILSPIKE_GOOD(0.00)[142.0.176.198:from]; MV_CASE(0.50)[]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_ALL(0.00)[]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[text/plain]; TO_DN_NONE(0.00)[]; DMARC_NA(0.00)[sohara.org]; RCPT_COUNT_ONE(0.00)[1]; NEURAL_HAM_LONG(-0.98)[-0.984]; RCVD_COUNT_THREE(0.00)[4]; NEURAL_HAM_MEDIUM(-0.97)[-0.969]; R_SPF_ALLOW(-0.20)[+ip4:142.0.176.0/20]; DKIM_TRACE(0.00)[email-od.com:+]; NEURAL_HAM_SHORT(-0.34)[-0.341]; RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE(0.00)[142.0.176.198:from]; FORGED_SENDER(0.30)[steve@sohara.org,4250.82.1d4c5000500c195.57cc7f0146846d38d71ea64aa1aec767@email-od.com]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+]; SUBJECT_ENDS_QUESTION(1.00)[]; ASN(0.00)[asn:7381, ipnet:142.0.176.0/22, country:US]; FROM_NEQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[steve@sohara.org,4250.82.1d4c5000500c195.57cc7f0146846d38d71ea64aa1aec767@email-od.com]; MAILMAN_DEST(0.00)[freebsd-questions] X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.33 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 25 Oct 2020 19:47:42 -0000 On Sun, 25 Oct 2020 06:50:25 +0100 Ralf Mardorf wrote: > A hot swap drive bay inherits the risk of a damage by static > electricity when changing drives. Pretty minimal risk IME - by the time you've opened the bay and pulled out the old drive you've discharged to ground (it's pretty much impossible not to touch grounded metal doing this) and as long as the replacement drive is to hand nothing is going to charge you up again. -- Steve O'Hara-Smith