From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Dec 24 02:26:09 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7D950106566B for ; Fri, 24 Dec 2010 02:26:09 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd-questions@herveybayaustralia.com.au) Received: from mail.unitedinsong.com.au (mail.unitedinsong.com.au [150.101.178.33]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2E0DC8FC18 for ; Fri, 24 Dec 2010 02:26:08 +0000 (UTC) Received: from laptop1.herveybayaustralia.com.au (laptop1.herveybayaustralia.com.au [192.168.0.193]) by mail.unitedinsong.com.au (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4DE005C21; Fri, 24 Dec 2010 12:31:00 +1000 (EST) Message-ID: <4D1403F1.3070607@herveybayaustralia.com.au> Date: Fri, 24 Dec 2010 12:22:41 +1000 From: Da Rock User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; FreeBSD amd64; en-US; rv:1.9.1.15) Gecko/20101119 Thunderbird/3.0.10 ThunderBrowse/3.3.4 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: utisoft@gmail.com References: <4D130719.5090203@herveybayaustralia.com.au> <4D133600.4010002@herveybayaustralia.com.au> <4D135558.4000101@herveybayaustralia.com.au> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: AMD Athlon64 Mainboard - NOT SPAM: please check it out :) X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 24 Dec 2010 02:26:09 -0000 On 12/24/10 01:44, Chris Rees wrote: > On 23 December 2010 13:57, Da Rock > wrote: > >> On 12/23/10 23:16, Chris Rees wrote: >> >>> On 23 December 2010 11:44, Da Rock >>> wrote: >>> >>> >>> >>>> Thanks, but Athlon64 is a 939. Yeah, it may not be worth salvaging, but I >>>> thought the cost might be less... I'm more than likely wrong. Worth >>>> putting >>>> feelers out, though :) >>>> >>>> >>>> >>> Athlon64s can be 754, 939 or AM2. Perhaps you meant *your* Athlon64 is a >>> 939? >>> >>> Sorry you're not having much luck. >>> >>> If I knew the Aussie market I'd help you to pick something comparable, >>> but that's better left to someone more local for you! >>> >>> Hope you get some results soon. >>> >>> >>> >>> >> Well thats from memory, and it is pretty old now I agree. Might have been a >> local thing then. As I remember it only the Athlon and then Semperon's were >> 754. The 64's and FX's were 939. The later Athlons were AM2, but that was >> just after I got this one, and they're the X2's I believe. But again, that >> may have been local. >> > I think you're thinking of Socket 462. This might clear it up a little: > > http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Athlon64 > > Chris > No, but you're right I'll agree. Mustn't have been available via my sources though- only the 32bit processors were 754 here, 64 had to be a 939. Probably some smartarse' marketing ploy... :)