From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG  Tue Nov 16 00:17:18 2004
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D482B16A4CE
	for <current@freebsd.org>; Tue, 16 Nov 2004 00:17:18 +0000 (GMT)
Received: from digger1.defence.gov.au (digger1.defence.gov.au [203.5.217.4])
	by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CAE4143D3F
	for <current@freebsd.org>; Tue, 16 Nov 2004 00:17:17 +0000 (GMT)
	(envelope-from wilkinsa@squash.dsto.defence.gov.au)
Received: from ednmsw503.dsto.defence.gov.au (ednmsw503.dsto.defence.gov.au
	[131.185.2.150])
	by digger1.defence.gov.au with ESMTP id iAG0GJZg006214
	for <current@freebsd.org>; Tue, 16 Nov 2004 10:46:19 +1030 (CST)
Received: from muttley.dsto.defence.gov.au (unverified) by 
    ednmsw503.dsto.defence.gov.au (Content Technologies SMTPRS 4.3.10) with 
    ESMTP id <T6d4d67022483b902965b0@ednmsw503.dsto.defence.gov.au> for 
    <current@freebsd.org>; Tue, 16 Nov 2004 10:47:11 +1030
Received: from ednex501.dsto.defence.gov.au 
    (ednex501.dsto.defence.gov.au [131.185.2.81]) by 
    muttley.dsto.defence.gov.au (8.11.3/8.11.3) with ESMTP id iAG0Axh00856 
    for <current@freebsd.org>; Tue, 16 Nov 2004 10:40:59 +1030 (CST)
Received: from squash.dsto.defence.gov.au ([131.185.40.212]) by 
    ednex501.dsto.defence.gov.au with SMTP 
    (Microsoft Exchange Internet Mail Service Version 5.5.2653.13) id 
    RZJDMS5B; Tue, 16 Nov 2004 10:40:52 +1030
Received: from squash.dsto.defence.gov.au (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by 
    squash.dsto.defence.gov.au (8.12.11/8.12.11) with ESMTP id iAG0BllS056438 
    for <current@freebsd.org>; Tue, 16 Nov 2004 10:41:47 +1030 (CST) 
    (envelope-from wilkinsa@squash.dsto.defence.gov.au)
Received: (from wilkinsa@localhost) by squash.dsto.defence.gov.au 
    (8.12.11/8.12.11/Submit) id iAG0Bk8o056437 for current@freebsd.org; Tue, 
    16 Nov 2004 10:41:46 +1030 (CST) (envelope-from wilkinsa)
Date: Tue, 16 Nov 2004 10:41:46 +1030
From: "Wilkinson, Alex" <alex.wilkinson@dsto.defence.gov.au>
To: current@freebsd.org
Message-ID: <20041116001146.GB56252@squash.dsto.defence.gov.au>
Mail-Followup-To: current@freebsd.org
References: <200411152211.iAFMB9YF016201@repoman.freebsd.org> 
    <30117.1100556843@critter.freebsd.dk>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <30117.1100556843@critter.freebsd.dk>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.6i
Subject: Re: [HEADSUP] vnode bypass for devices: "ON"
X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1
Precedence: list
List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current
	<freebsd-current.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current>,
	<mailto:freebsd-current-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-current>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-current@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-current-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current>,
	<mailto:freebsd-current-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 16 Nov 2004 00:17:18 -0000

Do u mind explaining what this actually means ? 

I'm "assuming" we are now by-passing the vnode layer for performance reasons ?

 - aW

	0n Mon, Nov 15, 2004 at 11:14:03PM +0100, Poul-Henning Kamp wrote: 
	
	Vnode bypass is now ON by default in -current.