From owner-freebsd-pf@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Mar 14 20:30:10 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-pf@hub.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F316C106564A for ; Sun, 14 Mar 2010 20:30:10 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from gnats@FreeBSD.org) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (freefall.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::28]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C7F468FC0C for ; Sun, 14 Mar 2010 20:30:10 +0000 (UTC) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id o2EKUA6C036443 for ; Sun, 14 Mar 2010 20:30:10 GMT (envelope-from gnats@freefall.freebsd.org) Received: (from gnats@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.14.4/8.14.4/Submit) id o2EKUAmZ036440; Sun, 14 Mar 2010 20:30:10 GMT (envelope-from gnats) Date: Sun, 14 Mar 2010 20:30:10 GMT Message-Id: <201003142030.o2EKUAmZ036440@freefall.freebsd.org> To: freebsd-pf@FreeBSD.org From: Nick Leuta Cc: Subject: Re: kern/143543: [pf] [panic] PF route-to causes kernel panic X-BeenThere: freebsd-pf@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: Nick Leuta List-Id: "Technical discussion and general questions about packet filter \(pf\)" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 14 Mar 2010 20:30:11 -0000 The following reply was made to PR kern/143543; it has been noted by GNATS. From: Nick Leuta To: bug-followup@FreeBSD.org, slava@aprec.ru Cc: Subject: Re: kern/143543: [pf] [panic] PF route-to causes kernel panic Date: Sun, 14 Mar 2010 23:20:44 +0300 Hmm... Im my case "ipfw fwd" command doesn't work too - it forwards locally generated packets using the routing table (???)... but yes, it has some effect - it changes the interface where the packets are originated. PF's "route-to" command works fine, but only if the destination host is reachable...