From owner-freebsd-arch Mon Oct 18 17: 8:52 1999 Delivered-To: freebsd-arch@freebsd.org Received: from ns1.yes.no (ns1.yes.no [195.204.136.10]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 63D4B15398 for ; Mon, 18 Oct 1999 17:08:47 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from eivind@bitbox.follo.net) Received: from bitbox.follo.net (bitbox.follo.net [195.204.143.218]) by ns1.yes.no (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id CAA29692 for ; Tue, 19 Oct 1999 02:08:46 +0200 (CEST) Received: (from eivind@localhost) by bitbox.follo.net (8.8.8/8.8.6) id CAA81224 for freebsd-arch@freebsd.org; Tue, 19 Oct 1999 02:08:45 +0200 (MET DST) Received: from critter.freebsd.dk (picasso.transbay.net [209.133.53.6]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 19F4E15395 for ; Mon, 18 Oct 1999 17:08:32 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from phk@critter.freebsd.dk) Received: from critter.freebsd.dk (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by critter.freebsd.dk (8.9.3/8.9.2) with ESMTP id CAA00988 for ; Tue, 19 Oct 1999 02:08:21 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from phk@critter.freebsd.dk) To: freebsd-arch@freebsd.org Subject: Re: The eventual fate of BLOCK devices. In-reply-to: Your message of "Mon, 18 Oct 1999 13:44:34 PDT." Date: Tue, 19 Oct 1999 02:08:21 +0200 Message-ID: <986.940291701@critter.freebsd.dk> From: Poul-Henning Kamp Sender: owner-freebsd-arch@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG In message , Jul ian Elischer writes: > >Here's something that needs to be solved before Block devices can go away: > >Fsck on / in single user mode is presently done of the block device >so that if fsck changes any blocks that are presently cached by the >filesystem, they get updated for the filesystem. No it isn't. Search for MNT_RELOAD in ufs/ffs. -- Poul-Henning Kamp FreeBSD coreteam member phk@FreeBSD.ORG "Real hackers run -current on their laptop." FreeBSD -- It will take a long time before progress goes too far! To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-arch" in the body of the message