From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG  Sun Mar 20 10:33:09 2005
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP
	id 50B7716A4CE; Sun, 20 Mar 2005 10:33:09 +0000 (GMT)
Received: from smtp.cegetel.net (mf01.sitadelle.com [212.94.174.80])
	by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP
	id 2804A43D2F; Sun, 20 Mar 2005 10:33:08 +0000 (GMT)
	(envelope-from jm.detrez@cegetel.net)
Received: from PORTABLE (80-125-70-51.dti.cegetel.net [80.125.70.51])
	by smtp.cegetel.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id B2F9C37CA5;
	Sun, 20 Mar 2005 11:33:06 +0100 (CET)
From: "jean-marc DETREZ" <jm.detrez@cegetel.net>
To: <gerald@FreeBSD.org>
Date: Sun, 20 Mar 2005 11:32:53 +0100
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Mailer: Microsoft Office Outlook, Build 11.0.5510
Thread-Index: AcUtOBJcgxcFefRlT/SPwCI/dOIZjQ==
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.2527
Message-Id: <20050320103306.B2F9C37CA5@smtp.cegetel.net>
Content-Type: text/plain;
	charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.1
cc: ports@FreeBSD.org
Subject: FreeBSD Port: wine-20050310
X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1
Precedence: list
List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD <freebsd-ports.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports>,
	<mailto:freebsd-ports-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-ports>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-ports@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-ports-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports>,
	<mailto:freebsd-ports-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 20 Mar 2005 10:33:09 -0000

Hello,

 

First of all thanks for your good work on this port .

 

 

I'm running FreeBSD 5.3 and I get messages from wine like "heap base address
0x80000000 not available. I have found some articles on the web on the lasts
months of 2004 who say that this problem was solve (by patch directly in the
port) I ve found a patch for the kernel too but it fails to works for me .

 

Is there a new issue?  Do I miss something??

 

Sorry for bad English (I'm French)

 

Thanks by advance for response

 

Jean-marc