From owner-freebsd-stable  Tue Aug 19 15:31:07 1997
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-stable>
Received: (from root@localhost)
          by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) id PAA10090
          for stable-outgoing; Tue, 19 Aug 1997 15:31:07 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ns.NL.net (ns.NL.net [193.78.240.1])
          by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) with SMTP id PAA10083
          for <stable@freebsd.org>; Tue, 19 Aug 1997 15:31:03 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from stuyts by ns.NL.net (5.65b/NLnet1.3)
	id AA17714; Wed, 20 Aug 1997 00:12:14 +0200
Received: from daneel.stuyts.nl (daneel.stuyts.nl [193.78.231.7])
	by terminus.stuyts.nl (8.8.7/8.8.5) with ESMTP id AAA03895;
	Wed, 20 Aug 1997 00:08:59 +0200 (MET DST)
Received: (from benst@localhost)
	by daneel.stuyts.nl (8.8.5/8.8.5) id AAA06905;
	Wed, 20 Aug 1997 00:09:14 +0200 (MET DST)
Message-Id: <199708192209.AAA06905@daneel.stuyts.nl>
Content-Type: text/plain
Mime-Version: 1.0 (NeXT Mail 3.3 v118.2)
In-Reply-To: <199708192148.PAA07476@rocky.mt.sri.com>
X-Nextstep-Mailer: Mail 3.3 (Enhance 1.2)
Received: by NeXT.Mailer (1.118.2)
From: Ben Stuyts <benst@terminus.stuyts.nl>
Date: Wed, 20 Aug 97 00:09:11 +0200
To: Nate Williams <nate@mt.sri.com>
Subject: Re: cvs keeps putting src/contrib/tcl/library/http1.0 back in
Cc: stable@freebsd.org
Reply-To: ben@stuyts.nl
References: <199708191952.VAA06781@daneel.stuyts.nl>
	<199708192055.OAA07251@rocky.mt.sri.com>
	<199708192128.XAA06872@daneel.stuyts.nl>
	<199708192148.PAA07476@rocky.mt.sri.com>
X-Unexpected: The Spanish Inquisition
Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
X-Loop: FreeBSD.org
Precedence: bulk

On Tue, 19 Aug 1997, Nate Williams wrote:

> > Slight side note: However, this means that 'make update' in /usr/src is
> > somewhat broken, because it always does a 'cvs -q update -P -d'.
>
> I could argue that 'make update' doesn't belong in the Makefile, but the
> other part is that it's assumed that anyone using the system is tracking
> -current, so this works there since developers never use TAGS in their
> development trees. :) :) :) :)

Well, I'm tracking everything. I need -stable at the office, and I want to go  
smp (i.e. -current) soon at home.

To continue the rant: Shouldn't /usr/src/Makefile on the RELENG_2_2 branch  
have the -r RELENG_2_2 in the make update target? (It has here now...) Would  
be a minor fix. Don't know if it would break something or somebody's habits  
though.

Best regards,
Ben