From owner-freebsd-hackers Thu Jun 5 00:41:45 1997 Return-Path: Received: (from root@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) id AAA01192 for hackers-outgoing; Thu, 5 Jun 1997 00:41:45 -0700 (PDT) Received: from housing1.stucen.gatech.edu (ken@housing1.stucen.gatech.edu [130.207.52.71]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id AAA01187 for ; Thu, 5 Jun 1997 00:41:43 -0700 (PDT) Received: (from ken@localhost) by housing1.stucen.gatech.edu (8.8.5/8.8.5) id DAA09474; Thu, 5 Jun 1997 03:40:52 -0400 (EDT) From: Kenneth Merry Message-Id: <199706050740.DAA09474@housing1.stucen.gatech.edu> Subject: Re: xntpd and SMP? In-Reply-To: <199706040544.HAA24516@zibbi.mikom.csir.co.za> from John Hay at "Jun 4, 97 07:44:20 am" To: jhay@zibbi.mikom.csir.co.za (John Hay) Date: Thu, 5 Jun 1997 03:40:51 -0400 (EDT) Cc: hackers@FreeBSD.ORG X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4ME+ PL31 (25)] MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk John Hay wrote... > Is there anyone using xntpd on SMP machines? We have a few dual-Pentium > machines that were running FreeBSD-UNI for the past few months and > xntpd was running fine on it. We upgraded them to 3.0-SMP a week or > so ago and from then on xntpd can't seem to stay in sync. I have tried > using the kernel PLL and without it, it does not seem to make a difference. I'm running xntpd on my machine, and haven't noticed any problems. here's the configuration: FreeBSD r74h118.res.gatech.edu 3.0-CURRENT FreeBSD 3.0-CURRENT #0: Wed May 28 22:49:27 EDT 1997 ken@r74h118.res.gatech.edu:/usr/src/sys/compile/panzer i386 SMP kernel ASUS P/I-P65UP5 w/ C-P6ND (i.e. dual P6) ntp server: ntp1.gatech.edu Ken -- Kenneth Merry ken@ulc199.residence.gatech.edu Disclaimer: I don't speak for GTRI, GT, or Elvis.