From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org  Sat Aug  4 17:59:57 2018
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org>
Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1])
 by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 88198104E416
 for <freebsd-ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org>;
 Sat,  4 Aug 2018 17:59:57 +0000 (UTC)
 (envelope-from eugen@grosbein.net)
Received: from hz.grosbein.net (hz.grosbein.net [IPv6:2a01:4f8:d12:604::2])
 (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits))
 (Client CN "hz.grosbein.net", Issuer "hz.grosbein.net" (not verified))
 by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id EE74781C0B;
 Sat,  4 Aug 2018 17:59:56 +0000 (UTC)
 (envelope-from eugen@grosbein.net)
Received: from eg.sd.rdtc.ru (eg.sd.rdtc.ru [IPv6:2a03:3100:c:13:0:0:0:5])
 by hz.grosbein.net (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTPS id w74HxhuG061109
 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT);
 Sat, 4 Aug 2018 19:59:44 +0200 (CEST)
 (envelope-from eugen@grosbein.net)
X-Envelope-From: eugen@grosbein.net
X-Envelope-To: lists@eitanadler.com
Received: from [10.58.0.4] ([10.58.0.4])
 by eg.sd.rdtc.ru (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTPS id w74HxYlv058840
 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=NOT);
 Sun, 5 Aug 2018 00:59:34 +0700 (+07)
 (envelope-from eugen@grosbein.net)
Subject: Re: Delete a port
To: Eitan Adler <lists@eitanadler.com>, Chris Rees <crees@bayofrum.net>
References: <a48a6cd2-e088-618a-61e6-909f71ce8ba5@fechner.net>
 <20180804140317.GA22029@blogreen.org> <5B65B4FB.70103@grosbein.net>
 <30EF106C-0794-4A24-918E-FE3132F8A632@bayofrum.net>
 <CAF6rxgnN_DcRerExsaBhvU7LQuSDa1nDha7Li4mPL5FoCO+nNQ@mail.gmail.com>
Cc: Matthias Fechner <idefix@fechner.net>,
 freebsd ports <freebsd-ports@freebsd.org>, Rene Ladan <rene@freebsd.org>
From: Eugene Grosbein <eugen@grosbein.net>
Message-ID: <5B65E982.90103@grosbein.net>
Date: Sun, 5 Aug 2018 00:59:30 +0700
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.3; WOW64; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101
 Thunderbird/38.7.2
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <CAF6rxgnN_DcRerExsaBhvU7LQuSDa1nDha7Li4mPL5FoCO+nNQ@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,LOCAL_FROM,SPF_PASS
 autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.1
X-Spam-Report: * -0.0 SPF_PASS SPF: sender matches SPF record
 * -2.3 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1%
 *      [score: 0.0000] *  2.6 LOCAL_FROM From my domains
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.1 (2015-04-28) on hz.grosbein.net
X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.27
Precedence: list
List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD <freebsd-ports.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/options/freebsd-ports>,
 <mailto:freebsd-ports-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-ports/>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-ports@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-ports-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports>,
 <mailto:freebsd-ports-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 04 Aug 2018 17:59:57 -0000

05.08.2018 0:42, Eitan Adler wrote:

>> Feel free to commit, but please use the  absolute path to vi?
> 
> Why? Would't one want to respect the user's preference when it comes
> to an editor? This preference is implicit when it comes to PATH.

This is traditional overcautiousness against user's possibly insecure
PATH having current directory that can lead to running malignant /tmp/vi
in multiuser environment.

Eugene