Date: Tue, 11 May 2004 21:37:57 +0200 From: Tijl Coosemans <tijl@ulyssis.org> To: sparc64@freebsd.org Subject: Re: [ports-sparc64@bento.FreeBSD.org: libticables-3.7.7_2 failed on sparc64 5] Message-ID: <20040511213757.37a2189e.tijl@ulyssis.org> In-Reply-To: <20040511010823.GB72214@xor.obsecurity.org> References: <20040511010823.GB72214@xor.obsecurity.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Mon, 10 May 2004 18:08:23 -0700, Kris Kennaway wrote: > ----- Forwarded message from User Ports-sparc64 > <ports-sparc64@bento.FreeBSD.org> ----- Full build log at http://bento.freebsd.org/errorlogs/sparc64-5-latest/libticables-3.7.7_2.log > In file included from ioports.c:45: > /usr/include/machine/sysarch.h:53: error: syntax error before > "utrap_entry_t" > /usr/include/machine/sysarch.h:64: error: syntax error before "type" > gmake[2]: *** [ioports.lo] Error 1 > gmake[2]: Leaving directory > `/tmp/a/ports/comms/libticables/work/libticables-3.7.7/src' > gmake[1]: *** [all-recursive] Error 1 > gmake[1]: Leaving directory > `/tmp/a/ports/comms/libticables/work/libticables-3.7.7' > gmake: *** [all] Error 2 > *** Error code 2 Apparently src/sys/sparc64/include/sysarch.h uses utrap_entry_t and utrap_handler_t without defining them. They are however defined in src/sys/sparc64/utrap.h. So I'm wondering, should I file a PR for my port to include machine/utrap.h(?) before machine/sysarch.h in case of a sparc64 build (or get rid of it since it is only used on i386), or is this a bug and should src/sys/sparc64/include/sysarch.h include machine/utrap.h (probably wrapped inside an #ifndef _KERNEL)?
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20040511213757.37a2189e.tijl>