From owner-freebsd-gnome@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Nov 20 07:51:33 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-gnome@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4DC6916A4CE for ; Thu, 20 Nov 2003 07:51:33 -0800 (PST) Received: from sv02.webonaut.com (kirk.webonaut.com [212.41.243.26]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E9D9C43FF2 for ; Thu, 20 Nov 2003 07:51:31 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from klammer@webonaut.com) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by sv02.webonaut.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id F01847642B; Thu, 20 Nov 2003 16:51:29 +0100 (CET) Received: from sv02.webonaut.com ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (sv02.webonaut.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 93133-07; Thu, 20 Nov 2003 16:51:27 +0100 (CET) Received: from webonaut.com (sisko.webonaut.com [212.41.243.28]) by sv02.webonaut.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E70787641F; Thu, 20 Nov 2003 16:51:26 +0100 (CET) Message-ID: <3FBCE303.8060202@webonaut.com> Date: Thu, 20 Nov 2003 16:51:31 +0100 From: Franz Klammer User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; FreeBSD i386; en-US; rv:1.5) Gecko/20031021 Thunderbird/0.3 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Jeremy Messenger References: <3FBB95BB.2090105@webonaut.com> <3FBB9CD2.4070201@webonaut.com> <3FBBA862.3070008@webonaut.com> <3FBBBBA6.5010301@webonaut.com> <20031119212505.GQ40706@toxic.magnesium.net> <20031119230406.001541f1.Alexander@Leidinger.net> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at webonaut.com cc: Alexander Leidinger cc: freebsd-gnome@freebsd.org Subject: Re: need your opinion/vote for name of gdesklets... X-BeenThere: freebsd-gnome@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: GNOME for FreeBSD -- porting and maintaining List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 20 Nov 2003 15:51:33 -0000 Jeremy Messenger wrote: > On Wed, 19 Nov 2003 23:04:06 +0100, Alexander Leidinger > wrote: > >> On 19 Nov 2003 16:25:05 -0500 >> Adam Weinberger wrote: >> >>> > 1) >>> > gdesklets--sensor >>> > gdesklets--display >>> > >>> > 2) >>> > gdesklets-sensor- >>> > gdesklets-display- >>> > >>> > Which is better? 1 or 2? Vote.... >> >> >> >>> I like 2 better. That way, I can easily search for gdesklets sensors by >>> doing locate gdesklets-sensor-. >> >> >> That's a very good reason... > > > I agree, #2 is already a winner. > >> What's the gdesklet syntax for referring to sensors/displays? Do we want >> to change it if it isn't 2)? > > > I am not sure, but I prefer to add 'gdesklets-' for ease to search. In > gentoo, they do desklet-display and desklet-sensor, no > space between. In Debian, they put all stuff together in a package and > name it as gdesklets-data. > > I personal think I will go for #2 above. > looks like the standard ist: there is no standard ;-) i've now PR'd one of the sensors. but i think the name is too long if we use gdesklet-sensor- eg: gdesklets-sensor-psi_iconbutton why we don't think about a 3rd solution: display&sensors: gdesklets- display only: gdesklets- sensor only: sensor- with that solution you will find only desklets with an display. sensor-only ports should be installed automatically as dependency. a normal user doen't need to find it and a developer knows how to search. franz. > Cheers, > Mezz > >> Bye, >> Alexander. > > > -- webonaut.com :: web technology klammer@webonaut.com :: http://webonaut.com/ fon +43-664-3434708 -- MIG_media intelligence group > agentur für werbung & neue medien A-5020 Salzburg > Linzergasse 21 Fon +43-662-453091-0 > Fax -99 office@mig.co.at > http://www.mig.co.at --