From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG  Mon Nov  1 14:26:17 2004
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7080016A4CE
	for <questions@freebsd.org>; Mon,  1 Nov 2004 14:26:17 +0000 (GMT)
Received: from imo-m14.mx.aol.com (imo-m14.mx.aol.com [64.12.138.204])
	by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D0FA743D1D
	for <questions@freebsd.org>; Mon,  1 Nov 2004 14:26:16 +0000 (GMT)
	(envelope-from TM4525@aol.com)
Received: from TM4525@aol.com
	by imo-m14.mx.aol.com (mail_out_v37_r3.8.) id n.46.5c699394 (25305)
	 for <questions@freebsd.org>; Mon, 1 Nov 2004 09:26:13 -0500 (EST)
From: TM4525@aol.com
Message-ID: <46.5c699394.2eb7a184@aol.com>
Date: Mon, 1 Nov 2004 09:26:12 EST
To: questions@freebsd.org
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Mailer: 9.0 for Windows sub 5114
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.1
Subject: Re: Compatible NIC
X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1
Precedence: list
List-Id: User questions <freebsd-questions.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions>,
	<mailto:freebsd-questions-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-questions>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-questions-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions>,
	<mailto:freebsd-questions-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 01 Nov 2004 14:26:17 -0000

In a message dated 11/1/04 1:36:24 AM Eastern Standard Time, 
krinklyfig@spymac.com writes:
On Sunday 31 October 2004 08:54 am, TM4525@aol.com wrote:

> I know who Kris is. I respect and appreciate his contributions. I
> don't respect
> being lied to. And I don't respect the unconditional rejection of
> criticism by the
> "team".

>This is not the appropriate venue for that sort of conversation. Please 
>take it elsewhere
"Yes Use 5.x"! is not technical "help".

"Don't use 5.x because its slow" IS technical help. You guys just dont
want anyone to say it.