From owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org  Fri Dec 21 13:44:02 2018
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>
Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1])
 by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id ABBD6134A0F8
 for <freebsd-questions@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org>;
 Fri, 21 Dec 2018 13:44:02 +0000 (UTC)
 (envelope-from v.velox@vvelox.net)
Received: from vulpes.vvelox.net (vulpes.vvelox.net [96.95.67.25])
 by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F30F396DE1
 for <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>; Fri, 21 Dec 2018 13:44:01 +0000 (UTC)
 (envelope-from v.velox@vvelox.net)
Received: from vixen42.vulpes.vvelox.net (vixen42.vulpes.vvelox.net
 [192.168.15.2]) (Authenticated sender: kitsune)
 by vulpes.vvelox.net (Postfix) with ESMTPA id 79178233547C
 for <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>; Fri, 21 Dec 2018 07:43:59 -0600 (CST)
Date: Fri, 21 Dec 2018 07:43:58 -0600
From: "Zane C. B-H." <v.velox@vvelox.net>
To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: Back again on Ryzen stability
Message-ID: <20181221074358.5cc4a725@vixen42.vulpes.vvelox.net>
In-Reply-To: <42a7a149-fa6b-390f-eb13-e10b437baaf7@netfence.it>
References: <42a7a149-fa6b-390f-eb13-e10b437baaf7@netfence.it>
X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.17.1 (GTK+ 2.24.32; amd64-portbld-freebsd11.2)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: F30F396DE1
X-Spamd-Bar: ----
Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org;
 spf=pass (mx1.freebsd.org: domain of v.velox@vvelox.net designates 96.95.67.25
 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=v.velox@vvelox.net
X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-4.05 / 15.00]; ARC_NA(0.00)[];
 RCVD_VIA_SMTP_AUTH(0.00)[]; NEURAL_HAM_MEDIUM(-1.00)[-0.999,0];
 FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; R_SPF_ALLOW(-0.20)[+ip4:96.95.67.25/32];
 TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_ALL(0.00)[]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[text/plain];
 TO_DN_NONE(0.00)[];
 PREVIOUSLY_DELIVERED(0.00)[freebsd-questions@freebsd.org];
 RCPT_COUNT_ONE(0.00)[1]; NEURAL_HAM_LONG(-1.00)[-1.000,0];
 DMARC_NA(0.00)[vvelox.net]; MX_GOOD(-0.01)[mail.vvelox.net];
 NEURAL_HAM_SHORT(-0.71)[-0.706,0];
 IP_SCORE(-1.14)[ipnet: 96.64.0.0/11(-4.76), asn: 7922(-0.85), country:
 US(-0.08)]; RCVD_NO_TLS_LAST(0.10)[]; FROM_EQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[];
 R_DKIM_NA(0.00)[]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+];
 ASN(0.00)[asn:7922, ipnet:96.64.0.0/11, country:US];
 RCVD_COUNT_TWO(0.00)[2]
X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: User questions <freebsd-questions.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/options/freebsd-questions>, 
 <mailto:freebsd-questions-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-questions/>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-questions-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions>, 
 <mailto:freebsd-questions-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 21 Dec 2018 13:44:02 -0000

On Sun, 2 Dec 2018 16:51:49 +0100
Andrea Venturoli <ml@netfence.it> wrote:

> Hello.
> 
> I'm evaluating a hardware upgrade and I've set my eyes on a Ryzen 7
> 2700 (coupled with an MSI B450-A Pro and 32GiB of RAM).
> I don't intend to overclock.
> 
> I've read many reports of stability issues with this kind of CPUs,
> but I think I understand they are gone. Right?
> Can I go ahead safely?
> 
> Will I need 12.0 or can 11.2 just run fine on this hardware?

Howdy!

Running a MSI MS-7A32 with a Ryzen 7 1800X here and it is rock stable.
I use it as a backend server, build system, and workstation. Have never
had an issue with long uptimes.

Currently running 11-STABLE as I've not had a chance to update to
12-STABLE for this box.