From owner-freebsd-questions Wed Jan 8 20:28:23 1997 Return-Path: Received: (from root@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.8.4/8.8.4) id UAA26782 for questions-outgoing; Wed, 8 Jan 1997 20:28:23 -0800 (PST) Received: from gdi.uoregon.edu (gdi.uoregon.edu [128.223.170.30]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.8.4/8.8.4) with ESMTP id UAA26767 for ; Wed, 8 Jan 1997 20:28:20 -0800 (PST) Received: from localhost (dwhite@localhost) by gdi.uoregon.edu (8.8.2/8.6.12) with SMTP id UAA08285; Wed, 8 Jan 1997 20:26:40 -0800 (PST) Date: Wed, 8 Jan 1997 20:26:40 -0800 (PST) From: Doug White X-Sender: dwhite@localhost Reply-To: dwhite@resnet.uoregon.edu To: Virgil Champlin cc: dgy@rtd.com, freebsd-questions@freebsd.org, champlin@pa.dec.com Subject: Re: Two AHA1542CF scsi controllers on 2.1.5-RELEASE In-Reply-To: <9701081931.AA18307@virgil.pa.dec.com> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-questions@freebsd.org X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk On Wed, 8 Jan 1997, Virgil Champlin wrote: > >>The "settings" also include IRQ and DRQ -- if these aren't disjoint, > >>I suspect you'll see much the same symptoms... > > Sorry, I wasn't clear. The cards have disjoint settings (ctlr0 = > iob330/irq11/drq6 and ctlr1 = iob334/irq10/drq7) and this was verified > when the driver probed them. Since the probe for ctlr0 > (iob330/irq11/drq6) worked and ctlr1 (iob334/irq10/drq7) didn't, I > simply swapped the cards base addresses (iob330 and iob334) to see if > there were any possible conflicts with irq10/drq7. Apparently not since > the probe reported iob330/irq10/drq7 as successful and iob334/irq11/drq6 > now had the timeout symptoms. Do any other devices use these resources? Many video cards use IRQ 11.... Doug White | University of Oregon Internet: dwhite@resnet.uoregon.edu | Residence Networking Assistant http://gladstone.uoregon.edu/~dwhite | Computer Science Major