From owner-freebsd-isp Tue May 28 19:03:47 1996 Return-Path: owner-isp Received: (from root@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.5/8.7.3) id TAA24250 for isp-outgoing; Tue, 28 May 1996 19:03:47 -0700 (PDT) Received: from MindBender.HeadCandy.com (root@[199.238.225.168]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.5/8.7.3) with ESMTP id TAA24245; Tue, 28 May 1996 19:03:42 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost.HeadCandy.com (michaelv@localhost.HeadCandy.com [127.0.0.1]) by MindBender.HeadCandy.com (8.7.5/8.6.9) with SMTP id TAA09834; Tue, 28 May 1996 19:03:05 -0700 (PDT) Message-Id: <199605290203.TAA09834@MindBender.HeadCandy.com> X-Authentication-Warning: MindBender.HeadCandy.com: Host michaelv@localhost.HeadCandy.com [127.0.0.1] didn't use HELO protocol To: "Aaron D. Gifford" cc: questions@freebsd.org, freebsd-isp@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Support for BusLogic BT958? (SCSI III UltraWide) In-reply-to: Your message of Tue, 28 May 96 10:41:29 -0600. <2.2.32.19960528164129.00b40d1c@infowest.com> Date: Tue, 28 May 1996 19:03:05 -0700 From: "Michael L. VanLoon -- HeadCandy.com" Sender: owner-isp@freebsd.org X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk >Is there/will there be support for BusLogic's MultiMaster 958 PCI SCSI >UltraWide controller? It is my understanding that the BT958 is a superior >SCSI UltraWide controller. Does anyone know if this is true/false? How >does it compare against Adaptec's 2940UW? The bt driver has always supported the BT958, even before it existed. :-) The bt driver supports *every* BusLogic SCSI controller, with the same interface, except the new FlashPoint controllers. Consult http://www.buslogic.com/ if you need help telling the difference... There have been a whole ton of posts on this, already (especially in the last couple months on current-users and/or port-i386@NetBSD.org -- you might want to see if it's in the archives over there). The Adaptec is a more modern design with lower command overhead. On very fast drives, on a very fast system, it has the potential to be faster. On my system (cheap drives, 486), I doubt I'd know the difference (I use the BusLogic BT747 EISA controller). The BusLogic is an excellent quality controller, but the technology in the BT742-based designs (which includes the BT958) is older than the Adaptec 2xxx controllers, being more like the Adaptec 174x. ----------------------------------------------------------------------------- Michael L. VanLoon michaelv@HeadCandy.com --< Free your mind and your machine -- NetBSD free un*x >-- NetBSD working ports: 386+PC, Mac 68k, Amiga, Atari 68k, HP300, Sun3, Sun4/4c/4m, DEC MIPS, DEC Alpha, PC532, VAX, MVME68k, arm32... NetBSD ports in progress: PICA, others... Roll your own Internet access -- Seattle People's Internet cooperative. If you're in the Seattle area, ask me how. -----------------------------------------------------------------------------