From owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Sat May 2 19:38:51 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 80E33106566C for ; Sat, 2 May 2009 19:38:51 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from christoph.mallon@gmx.de) Received: from mail.gmx.net (mail.gmx.net [213.165.64.20]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id C40DF8FC13 for ; Sat, 2 May 2009 19:38:50 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from christoph.mallon@gmx.de) Received: (qmail invoked by alias); 02 May 2009 19:38:49 -0000 Received: from p54A3DE1D.dip.t-dialin.net (EHLO tron.homeunix.org) [84.163.222.29] by mail.gmx.net (mp012) with SMTP; 02 May 2009 21:38:49 +0200 X-Authenticated: #1673122 X-Provags-ID: V01U2FsdGVkX1+4yb4SfMy4veX2x6Fbz/Og8cXhTS//eTA7yqJd1d F1JYufEdSowzPi Message-ID: <49FCA148.9060707@gmx.de> Date: Sat, 02 May 2009 21:38:48 +0200 From: Christoph Mallon User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.21 (X11/20090412) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Julian Elischer References: <49F4070C.2000108@gmx.de> <20090502073658.GA65633@walton.maths.tcd.ie> <49FC752D.5080807@elischer.org> <49FC8574.5060205@gmx.de> <49FC8920.6050408@elischer.org> <49FC8E92.1090207@gmx.de> <49FC9A02.6080901@elischer.org> In-Reply-To: <49FC9A02.6080901@elischer.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Y-GMX-Trusted: 0 X-FuHaFi: 0.73 Cc: Maxim Sobolev , FreeBSD Hackers , Roman Divacky , Ed Schouten , David Malone , Warner Losh Subject: Re: C99: Suggestions for style(9) X-BeenThere: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Technical Discussions relating to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 02 May 2009 19:38:51 -0000 Julian Elischer schrieb: > Christoph Mallon wrote: >> Julian Elischer schrieb: >>> Christoph Mallon wrote: > >> >> So at the one hand you argue that hunting things is bad, but at the >> same time you prefer it? I am confused. > > well, I won't hold your problems against you.. :-) It is sad that you are just toying around instead of answering a simple question: Christoph Mallon wrote: >> K&R code should be changed as part of related changes if possible. >> A sweep to change a whole file is probably also ok. >> changing them one at a time is probably not ok. > > But this is what actually is practiced. > You still did not answer my question: Do you agree to remove the clause so no new old style declarations may be added?