Date: Fri, 25 Jan 2008 08:44:47 +0200 From: Giorgos Keramidas <keramida@ceid.upatras.gr> To: william wong <beijing.liangjie@gmail.com> Cc: Dag-Erling Sm?rgrav <des@des.no>, freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Subject: Re: FreeBSD hacker 101 Message-ID: <20080125064447.GB71944@kobe.laptop> In-Reply-To: <84a208a0801242158q632314dfpd370a2fee2f87390@mail.gmail.com> References: <84a208a0801232306k6a34134aqd549a1ba2160fe41@mail.gmail.com> <86bq7bwlot.fsf@ds4.des.no> <84a208a0801240456q3154de92me73e846df84d587a@mail.gmail.com> <86prvrv0b1.fsf@ds4.des.no> <84a208a0801240711j979874apad2d17c9afdbd6e@mail.gmail.com> <86fxwn877v.fsf@ds4.des.no> <84a208a0801242158q632314dfpd370a2fee2f87390@mail.gmail.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 2008-01-25 13:58, william wong <beijing.liangjie@gmail.com> wrote: > That brings me to another ponder: why juniper and cisco are using > FreeBSD and not Linux even Linux performs better in an UP environment? That's probably something only Juniper and Cisco can answer with a sufficiently high degree of confidence that the answer *does* reflecty reality. I bet you the licensing model plays an important part in the decision though :)
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20080125064447.GB71944>