Date: Wed, 04 Dec 2019 07:29:57 +0000 From: "Poul-Henning Kamp" <phk@phk.freebsd.dk> To: Ed Maste <emaste@freebsd.org> Cc: freebsd-arch <freebsd-arch@freebsd.org>, freebsd-arm <freebsd-arm@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: arm64 as Tier 1 for FreeBSD 13 Message-ID: <17938.1575444597@critter.freebsd.dk> In-Reply-To: <CAPyFy2BXWPVOJo%2BGOf83sZFrPHE80-QvdHeWrhi%2BTdj0KDnThg@mail.gmail.com> References: <CAPyFy2Aa6Uj0nyQ1Y_KPLd7%2BROJ4xW5i-SpctV1sRVK_BivPHw@mail.gmail.com> <CAPyFy2D91v7SwjZOgMG0a9V%2BH6GVCF8NHKp341N8mwnCvA71cA@mail.gmail.com> <CAPyFy2BP3hFHuFJyo2M-5pc0%2BCmRiyym1TZ81P5xicR4zED1JQ@mail.gmail.com> <CAPyFy2BXWPVOJo%2BGOf83sZFrPHE80-QvdHeWrhi%2BTdj0KDnThg@mail.gmail.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
-------- In message <CAPyFy2BXWPVOJo+GOf83sZFrPHE80-QvdHeWrhi+Tdj0KDnThg@mail.gmail= .com>, Ed Maste writes: >> Binary updates and source patches for Security Advisories and Errata >> Notices will be provided for supported releases. > >We don't do this today, but have the ability to do so for arm64 server >platforms. (Due to its design, freebsd-update does not work >particularly well on devices with slow root filesystems such as SD >cards.) I don't think storage-technology should be used as a discriminant here. First because it is quite trivial to plug in a quality USB SSD (WD passport for instance) and use that as root filesystem. Second, just because freebsd-update takes a day to run, doesn't mean that people would not want it. -- = Poul-Henning Kamp | UNIX since Zilog Zeus 3.20 phk@FreeBSD.ORG | TCP/IP since RFC 956 FreeBSD committer | BSD since 4.3-tahoe = Never attribute to malice what can adequately be explained by incompetence= .
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?17938.1575444597>