From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Fri May 7 21:59:18 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 87B5016A4E9; Fri, 7 May 2004 21:59:16 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mx.nsu.ru (mx.nsu.ru [212.192.164.5]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 137DD43D48; Fri, 7 May 2004 21:59:16 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from danfe@regency.nsu.ru) Received: from regency.nsu.ru ([193.124.210.26]) by mx.nsu.ru with esmtp (Exim 4.30) id 1BMK2v-0004Ux-38; Sat, 08 May 2004 12:06:45 +0700 Received: from regency.nsu.ru (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by regency.nsu.ru (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id i4850VAT006663; Sat, 8 May 2004 12:00:31 +0700 (NOVST) (envelope-from danfe@regency.nsu.ru) Received: (from danfe@localhost) by regency.nsu.ru (8.12.10/8.12.10/Submit) id i4850VGX006625; Sat, 8 May 2004 12:00:31 +0700 (NOVST) (envelope-from danfe) Date: Sat, 8 May 2004 12:00:30 +0700 From: Alexey Dokuchaev To: Eric Anholt Message-ID: <20040508050030.GA4020@regency.nsu.ru> References: <200405072010.i47KAnoG032811@repoman.freebsd.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <200405072010.i47KAnoG032811@repoman.freebsd.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.1i cc: ports@freebsd.org cc: cvs-ports@freebsd.org cc: cvs-all@freebsd.org cc: ports-committers@freebsd.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: ports/x11 Makefile ports/x11/panoramixext Makefile distinfo pkg-descr pkg-plist X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 08 May 2004 04:59:18 -0000 On Fri, May 07, 2004 at 01:10:49PM -0700, Eric Anholt wrote: ... > New port: panoramixext 1.1 freedesktop.org: > X PanoramiX extension headers > > Testing is encouraged, but please do not use these ports as dependencies until > a plan is made for handling the transition from XFree86. What do you mean by "transition from XFree86" here, precisely? Is there intention to prefer FDo's bits over XFree86, or just provide a coherent way to choose between the two? If former, what's wrong with XFree86 so such transition is a concern? I assume that it's not related to recent license policy change in XFree86 camp, am I right? ./danfe