From owner-freebsd-current Tue Jan 18 10: 5: 6 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix, from userid 758) id 65CB114FFB; Tue, 18 Jan 2000 10:04:29 -0800 (PST) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 558091CD466; Tue, 18 Jan 2000 10:04:29 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from kris@hub.freebsd.org) Date: Tue, 18 Jan 2000 10:04:29 -0800 (PST) From: Kris Kennaway To: Peter Wemm Cc: current@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Feature test for OpenSSL + RSA In-Reply-To: <20000118104019.DCD111CD9@overcee.netplex.com.au> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG On Tue, 18 Jan 2000, Peter Wemm wrote: > Yes, This should most definately have ${DESTDIR} for this sort of thing, but > even then I'm not sure this is a good change.. We have got to find a better > way than this. I've said this a couple of times in private, but will repeat it again for the list: we could do something like `nm /usr/lib/libcrypto.so | grep RSA_free`, but this seemed ugly and non-obvious to me (e.g. if someone who is not bsd.port.mk wanted to check whether their openssl port was RSA-enabled). It also seems to get invoked about 20 times during the course of making an openssl-using port (at least, that's how many times my debugging echos get run :) Kris ---- "How many roads must a man walk down, before you call him a man?" "Eight!" "That was a rhetorical question!" "Oh..then, seven!" -- Homer Simpson To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message