From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG  Sun Jul 26 14:18:07 2009
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9BB1F1065673
	for <freebsd-current@freebsd.org>; Sun, 26 Jul 2009 14:18:07 +0000 (UTC)
	(envelope-from spambox@haruhiism.net)
Received: from fujibayashi.jp (karas.fujibayashi.jp [77.221.159.4])
	by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 54E628FC18
	for <freebsd-current@freebsd.org>; Sun, 26 Jul 2009 14:18:07 +0000 (UTC)
	(envelope-from spambox@haruhiism.net)
Received: from [192.168.0.2] (ppp91-122-47-189.pppoe.avangarddsl.ru
	[91.122.47.189])
	(using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))
	(No client certificate requested)
	by fujibayashi.jp (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 5F08478F54;
	Sun, 26 Jul 2009 18:18:05 +0400 (MSD)
Message-ID: <4A6C659C.9010600@haruhiism.net>
Date: Sun, 26 Jul 2009 18:18:04 +0400
From: Kamigishi Rei <spambox@haruhiism.net>
User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.22 (Windows/20090605)
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: barbara <barbara.xxx1975@libero.it>
References: <KNE7BE$52FFD73D782F6FA63E2EAFCC0B6339D5@libero.it>
In-Reply-To: <KNE7BE$52FFD73D782F6FA63E2EAFCC0B6339D5@libero.it>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Cc: freebsd-current <freebsd-current@freebsd.org>,
	"glen.j.barber" <glen.j.barber@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: FreeBSD-8 and portsnap
X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current
	<freebsd-current.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current>, 
	<mailto:freebsd-current-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-current>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-current@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-current-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current>,
	<mailto:freebsd-current-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 26 Jul 2009 14:18:07 -0000

barbara wrote:
> If you remove those files and run portsnap fetch update again, you will find only fresh INDEX-[5-7].
> Maybe it's caused by the fact INDEX-8 is not built on portsnap servers, but I really don't know.
>   
Apparently, I can confirm this.
I use portsnap fetch extract to populate my /usr/ports tree on all my 
systems, and on 8-CURRENT machines 8-INDEX seems missing.

--
Kamigishi Rei
KREI-RIPE