From owner-freebsd-ports Wed Feb 5 15:10:43 2003 Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9AB7C37B401; Wed, 5 Feb 2003 15:10:42 -0800 (PST) Received: from haystack.lclark.edu (haystack.lclark.edu [149.175.1.2]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id BA53643FA3; Wed, 5 Feb 2003 15:10:08 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from anholt@FreeBSD.org) Received: from [149.175.30.191] ([149.175.30.191]) by haystack.lclark.edu (SAVSMTP 3.0.0.44) with SMTP id M2003020515095809748 ; Wed, 05 Feb 2003 15:09:58 -0800 Subject: Re: [kde-freebsd] Re: cvs commit: ports/x11/kdebase3 Makefile From: Eric Anholt To: Mario Sergio Fujikawa Ferreira Cc: Will Andrews , Andy Fawcett , Mikhail Teterin , kde@FreeBSD.ORG, ports@FreeBSD.ORG In-Reply-To: <20030205114532.98040.qmail@exxodus.fedaykin.here> References: <200302031235.h13CZwGB073669@repoman.freebsd.org> <200302042037.03489.andy@athame.co.uk> <1044388064.615.41.camel@leguin> <200302042225.15764.andy@athame.co.uk> <20030204220409.GC20600@procyon.firepipe.net> <20030205114532.98040.qmail@exxodus.fedaykin.here> Content-Type: text/plain Organization: Message-Id: <1044486743.621.2.camel@leguin> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Ximian Evolution 1.2.0 Date: 05 Feb 2003 15:12:24 -0800 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.org On Wed, 2003-02-05 at 03:45, Mario Sergio Fujikawa Ferreira wrote: > On Tue, Feb 04, 2003 at 02:03:47PM -0800, Will Andrews wrote: > > On Tue, Feb 04, 2003 at 10:25:15PM +0200, Andy Fawcett wrote: > > > And, I find myself agreeing with mi, the ports cluster would quite > > > possibly be the best place for this to be tested. Now, who do we bribe > > > to let us try that? ;) > > > > You might be able to bribe me into doing it on FruitSalad's > > cluster instead. That will be easier to do. :) > > We're already running a Xft2 test against the KDE 3.1 > suite on FruitSalad using the trick suggested by Eric. However, > this currenly only tests for KDE problems. :) It seems that removing all the x11-fonts/Xft patches results in problems with the port (no headers installed), so expect pain. That is, unless I was just too tired last night. I'm working on a set of patches for the whole port tree, which I hope I can get tested on a cluster somewhere. It'll break gnome, though, unless I get excited about it enough to chase down patches from elsewhere. -- Eric Anholt eta@lclark.edu http://people.freebsd.org/~anholt/ anholt@FreeBSD.org To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-ports" in the body of the message