From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Aug 29 22:39:06 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C303616A4D3; Sun, 29 Aug 2004 22:39:06 +0000 (GMT) Received: from TRANG.nuxi.com (trang.nuxi.com [66.93.134.19]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 80ED343D2F; Sun, 29 Aug 2004 22:39:06 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from obrien@NUXI.com) Received: from dragon.nuxi.com (obrien@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by TRANG.nuxi.com (8.13.1/8.12.11) with ESMTP id i7TMd5Da094150; Sun, 29 Aug 2004 15:39:06 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from obrien@dragon.nuxi.com) Received: (from obrien@localhost) by dragon.nuxi.com (8.13.1/8.13.1/Submit) id i7TMd52h094149; Sun, 29 Aug 2004 15:39:05 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from obrien) Date: Sun, 29 Aug 2004 15:39:05 -0700 From: "David O'Brien" To: Gordon Tetlow Message-ID: <20040829223905.GB92947@dragon.nuxi.com> Mail-Followup-To: David O'Brien , Gordon Tetlow , current@freebsd.org References: <200408160104.03708.chris@behanna.org> <20040826005527.GF54515@spiff.melthusia.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20040826005527.GF54515@spiff.melthusia.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.1i X-Operating-System: FreeBSD 6.0-CURRENT Organization: The NUXI BSD Group X-Pgp-Rsa-Fingerprint: B7 4D 3E E9 11 39 5F A3 90 76 5D 69 58 D9 98 7A X-Pgp-Rsa-Keyid: 1024/34F9F9D5 cc: current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Public Access to Perforce? X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list Reply-To: obrien@freebsd.org List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 29 Aug 2004 22:39:06 -0000 On Wed, Aug 25, 2004 at 05:55:28PM -0700, Gordon Tetlow wrote: > Now Perforce performance demands that as much of the metadata in memory > as possible. We are already starting to see the pressure with the > operations that our developers are doing on the depot. When we ask > Perforce support about ways to improve it, they generally tell us to > throw more memory at the problem but we are limited in how far we can > go with that (the box already has 2GB of memory in it). Ask Perforce to port to 64-bit AMD64. That would allow them to have a lot more memory for their in-memory operations. -- -- David (obrien@FreeBSD.org)