From owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG Fri May 9 19:13:50 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5350B1065672 for ; Fri, 9 May 2008 19:13:50 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from ccowart@rescomp.berkeley.edu) Received: from hal.rescomp.berkeley.edu (hal.Rescomp.Berkeley.EDU [169.229.70.150]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3EA948FC24 for ; Fri, 9 May 2008 19:13:50 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from ccowart@rescomp.berkeley.edu) Received: by hal.rescomp.berkeley.edu (Postfix, from userid 1225) id 1E3403C04F9; Fri, 9 May 2008 12:13:50 -0700 (PDT) Date: Fri, 9 May 2008 12:13:50 -0700 From: Christopher Cowart To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20080509191350.GW89055@hal.rescomp.berkeley.edu> Mail-Followup-To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org References: <20080509180152.GV89055@hal.rescomp.berkeley.edu> <20080509184610.GB30415@verio.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="2y8j+ZQnxuzsbzfy" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20080509184610.GB30415@verio.net> Organization: RSSP-IT, UC Berkeley User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.16 (2007-06-09) Subject: Re: carp and vlan interfaces recovery issue X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 09 May 2008 19:13:50 -0000 --2y8j+ZQnxuzsbzfy Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable David DeSimone wrote: > Christopher Cowart wrote: > > > > Notice that both carp interfaces are running in "BACKUP" mode on box1, > > even after some period of waiting. I would expect things to return to > > the initial state.=20 >=20 > net.inet.carp.preempt=3D1 ? They return to the initial states when I perform the down/up on the physical parent interface without turning on preempt. My point was the behavior when moving a vlan from down to up is different from moving the physical interface from down to up; I don't think they should be. --=20 Chris Cowart Network Technical Lead Network & Infrastructure Services, RSSP-IT UC Berkeley --2y8j+ZQnxuzsbzfy Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.4 (FreeBSD) iQIVAwUBSCSibSPHEDszU3zYAQLzZxAAhrIcAHtgHEC1T/oj4Y8hFW4R6mf8pRdv egMcSwX2DHL57J1e/uH7cmhFRUSQN/nwhdNtRBjFeseVlBI+OhoPGL43ZVIQWbxc f4w6bDYnAIWm7CdGQGUPzL9/+4DJ/syccYwKTEzi1MEpaTTJ25hX/G4pYg8nUO9f ln86+XEKexvF/p/K8ZxrKa5UkpRToXUWGRV+5Vo5BioNTVl33zdZoQeNp6/1nQvp 32iav5mWlW6CPcCkN8iUoLu8JaQWUUixlUaAJoxgLDa/MuznptuKcY+lKgawaqYn tmj31B38KSfdvD3xf1HWytPvRV44lmY+UV1hkQ9QyU1blcyXQg1RvrOpr52CJJ67 lEzlQX/QPW0kXxyZzwnV5kY7qcPxqA7qjS84SZfN1EmapTCVLwPXBlOPpV1Hx8cW +xfCqbEDyFkI+9+dlm+wd/41KN19ooSRQpEBEqvoZOYwjK6h7L54SFl3ApLfxjYW 3KAD1RuofyBwifD1yKd5N177hMBPHLyWs+6fdCiE8e8Ju8UUj7HwkHQXTZ+x7i0r BikEMkQyCIIxgmbJI2ajFCL6SVzQjHrtc11CTuZVgmfLZxGnEZUMVfeVBZBgVmvb BeJt/piuwyWHM1hjlXvOICdAnp6ZBnhpYyGYBf8I6/5XgnfhFrP+OIHwjVnSfEww rk8PSsNG02s= =Pz2b -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --2y8j+ZQnxuzsbzfy--