Date: Thu, 27 Jul 1995 18:56:04 -0700 From: "Jordan K. Hubbard" <jkh@time.cdrom.com> To: rkw@dataplex.net (Richard Wackerbarth) Cc: hackers@freebsd.org Subject: Re: New 2.1.0-950726-SNAP available - come 'n get it! Message-ID: <5014.806896564@time.cdrom.com> In-Reply-To: Your message of "Thu, 27 Jul 1995 20:50:36 CDT." <v02130500ac3defc0ad91@[199.183.109.242]>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> So, how does 2.1-SNAP compare to the -STABLE code I "sup"ed last night? Should be identical, modulo anything not installed by `make world' like the stuff in /etc. > Should I follow -STABLE daily or simply wait for 2.1-SNAP's? IOW, will the Up to you, really! > SNAP releases match the tree as sup'ed at some particular time and can I > expect the -STABLE tree to remain consistent with itself? (Something that > is NOT true of -CURRENT) Yes, I think.. I'm really not sure what you mean here though! > Will we expect to see 2.2-SNAP's before 2.1 is released? Yes, the minute that enough "new" stuff in 2.2 exists to warrant a snap along that branch. I actually had a 2.2 snap built here but I killed it after realizing that there really wasn't enough difference between 2.1 and 2.2 right now to justify it. That may change. Jordan
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?5014.806896564>