Date: Tue, 4 Mar 1997 13:41:48 +0300 (MSK) From: =?KOI8-R?B?4c7E0sXKIP7F0s7P1w==?= <ache@nagual.ru> To: David Greenman <dg@root.com> Cc: Gary Palmer <gpalmer@FreeBSD.ORG>, Bruce Evans <bde@zeta.org.au>, cvs-all@freefall.freebsd.org, CVS-committers@freefall.freebsd.org, cvs-sys@freefall.freebsd.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: src/sys/i386/isa clock.c Message-ID: <Pine.BSF.3.95q.970304134034.563A-100000@nagual.ru> In-Reply-To: <199703041024.CAA12936@root.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Tue, 4 Mar 1997, David Greenman wrote: > >David Greenman wrote in message ID > ><199703041013.CAA12868@root.com>: > >> The clock calibration line should not be emitted unless bootverbose is > >> specified. It is meaningless to most people and is just more cruft to fill > >> up the message buffer. > > > >Since there is a pause while the clocks are calibrated, perhaps a > >simple `Calibrating clocks\n' style message for the nonverbose case? > >Would that keep most/all people happy? > > The pause isn't long enough to matter. No message should be emitted. I think some message should be emmited, if clock calibration gives wrong results and no message in usual case. -- Andrey A. Chernov <ache@null.net> http://www.nagual.ru/~ache/
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?Pine.BSF.3.95q.970304134034.563A-100000>