From owner-p4-projects@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Aug 28 00:27:30 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: p4-projects@freebsd.org Received: by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix, from userid 32767) id 84B2416A4CE; Sat, 28 Aug 2004 00:27:30 +0000 (GMT) Delivered-To: perforce@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3C63816A4CF for ; Sat, 28 Aug 2004 00:27:30 +0000 (GMT) Received: from repoman.freebsd.org (repoman.freebsd.org [216.136.204.115]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E954343D53 for ; Sat, 28 Aug 2004 00:27:29 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from peter@freebsd.org) Received: from repoman.freebsd.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by repoman.freebsd.org (8.12.11/8.12.11) with ESMTP id i7S0RTEJ081636 for ; Sat, 28 Aug 2004 00:27:29 GMT (envelope-from peter@freebsd.org) Received: (from perforce@localhost) by repoman.freebsd.org (8.12.11/8.12.11/Submit) id i7S0RTcl081633 for perforce@freebsd.org; Sat, 28 Aug 2004 00:27:29 GMT (envelope-from peter@freebsd.org) Date: Sat, 28 Aug 2004 00:27:29 GMT Message-Id: <200408280027.i7S0RTcl081633@repoman.freebsd.org> X-Authentication-Warning: repoman.freebsd.org: perforce set sender to peter@freebsd.org using -f From: Peter Wemm To: Perforce Change Reviews Subject: PERFORCE change 60563 for review X-BeenThere: p4-projects@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: p4 projects tree changes List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 28 Aug 2004 00:27:31 -0000 http://perforce.freebsd.org/chv.cgi?CH=60563 Change 60563 by peter@peter_daintree on 2004/08/28 00:26:44 see jeffr's comments Affected files ... .. //depot/projects/hammer/sys/kern/sched_ule.c#42 edit Differences ... ==== //depot/projects/hammer/sys/kern/sched_ule.c#42 (text+ko) ==== @@ -1200,7 +1200,16 @@ if (newtd != NULL) { kseq_load_add(KSEQ_SELF(), newtd->td_kse); ke->ke_cpu = PCPU_GET(cpuid); +#if 0 +/* +05:25 The runq should be NULL and should stay NULL at that point. +05:25 If you look a few lines above you see the !TD_IS_RUNNING() case in the else clause. +05:26 Where it removes the load of a thread if it has a non null runq. +05:26 In the preemption case I was assigning it to a runq but never adding the load. +05:26 So this probably caused the counter to hit -1. +*/ ke->ke_runq = KSEQ_SELF()->ksq_curr; +#endif } else newtd = choosethread(); if (td != newtd)