From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Aug 28 21:39:03 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2069FA9A for ; Wed, 28 Aug 2013 21:39:03 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from nonesuch@longcount.org) Received: from mail-qe0-f53.google.com (mail-qe0-f53.google.com [209.85.128.53]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D2C2D2985 for ; Wed, 28 Aug 2013 21:39:02 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-qe0-f53.google.com with SMTP id 1so3796885qee.40 for ; Wed, 28 Aug 2013 14:38:56 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:subject:references:from:content-type:in-reply-to :message-id:date:to:content-transfer-encoding:mime-version; bh=w5t+pv19YlFerX+glI1wOx0G0Ijr8YEBlygN1VgLVmY=; b=dbMY7gb6xQ25mf+/ma276HhDVUXX9c4IOg/CYAgovENPH3wm+JydjW9bBZ7B+C4w/0 8bRRtO7rzmFm2E9v/WvVYr3PCDyHARFWbRjUv/tyZ7Zqk4ACwZnEE7jILI1rnybTtRH7 c6ZKelozjAk+NAbuEKYiiqgIgH6XMs/sOCPoLuKx1mdR2lb5zPwZkVbGRbhDeVamaOw5 zcl08Z2S2NKgJF5tN6d12TUl4DDS5FeuxJFjTbgvJSt0wfcHMx2DdP73hs5dq23POAFC P8HybxoXg8bQzxPsXUnu3bnTjFzrMM22U9ulHnrt2r3NZekLxo6oOf3KeQl0Zk45XuMx lynQ== X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQkK2knIB7VxvMNKXuNBYWZl/2MZEQAP/dpouEh/v4lQUKA5kZbBbfBlqvkWKhnlvZeGEBX3 X-Received: by 10.49.63.3 with SMTP id c3mr47497qes.2.1377725579630; Wed, 28 Aug 2013 14:32:59 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [70.204.78.37] (37.sub-70-204-78.myvzw.com. [70.204.78.37]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id z10sm25463817qal.9.1969.12.31.16.00.00 (version=TLSv1 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA bits=128/128); Wed, 28 Aug 2013 14:32:58 -0700 (PDT) Subject: Re: Suggest changing dirhash defaults for FreeBSD 9.2. References: <521C9E85.4060801@UToledo.edu> <521D7552.5080008@UToledo.edu> <20130828202535.ace8f6c882e94f21f7509966@getmail.no> <1377719961203-5839745.post@n5.nabble.com> From: Mark Saad Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Mailer: iPhone Mail (10B329) In-Reply-To: <1377719961203-5839745.post@n5.nabble.com> Message-Id: Date: Wed, 28 Aug 2013 17:32:33 -0400 To: "freebsd-stable@freebsd.org" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Mime-Version: 1.0 (1.0) X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 28 Aug 2013 21:39:03 -0000 On Aug 28, 2013, at 3:59 PM, Robert_Burmeister wrote: > Torfinn Ingolfsen-5 wrote >> On Tue, 27 Aug 2013 23:58:10 -0400 >> Robert Burmeister < >=20 >> Robert.Burmeister@ >=20 >> > wrote: >>>=20 >>> As 64 bit platforms tend to have more RAM and use ZFS, >> Do you have any numbers for the "64 bit platforms tend to use ZFS"? >=20 > PCBSD and OSX both default to ZFS for their 64 bit installs, > and anyone else wanting to use ZFS will choose 64 bit for the address spac= e. >=20 OSX abandoned zfs back in 10.7, I think you meant Solaris 10 update 5ish and= newer use zfs root by default. fwiw I am using ufs on amd64 too and have o= nly some machines using zfs . > Do to the kernel memory constraints,=20 > ZFS takes some configuration jiggering to work stably on 32 bit. >=20 >=20 >=20 >=20 > -- > View this message in context: http://freebsd.1045724.n5.nabble.com/Suggest= -changing-dirhash-defaults-for-FreeBSD-9-2-tp5839351p5839745.html > Sent from the freebsd-stable mailing list archive at Nabble.com. > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-stable-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" Mark saad | mark.saad@longcount.org