From owner-freebsd-current Fri Apr 4 04:12:43 1997 Return-Path: Received: (from root@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) id EAA04022 for current-outgoing; Fri, 4 Apr 1997 04:12:43 -0800 (PST) Received: from korin.warman.org.pl (korin.warman.org.pl [148.81.160.10]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id EAA03998 for ; Fri, 4 Apr 1997 04:12:01 -0800 (PST) Received: from localhost (abial@localhost) by korin.warman.org.pl (8.8.3/8.7.3) with SMTP id OAA14437; Fri, 4 Apr 1997 14:11:07 +0200 (MET DST) Date: Fri, 4 Apr 1997 14:10:58 +0200 (MET DST) From: Andrzej Bialecki To: Garrett Wollman cc: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: IPv6 && -current In-Reply-To: <199704031529.KAA04612@khavrinen.lcs.mit.edu> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-current@freebsd.org X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk On Thu, 3 Apr 1997, Garrett Wollman wrote: > < said: > > > What is the status of IPv6 implementation under -current? I'd be probably > > interested in setting up a machine and a tunnel to 6bone, so I would > > gladly use FreeBSD for this, if it's possible... > > I am aware of two implementations out there, and the unfortunate truth > is that both of them suck, in different ways. (Although at least one > of them, I am told, is getting significantly better stylistically.) > Until this situation changes a bit more (or we find someone interested > in doing an IPv6 implementation that obeys style(9) and isn't > altogether bletcherous), there should not be IPv6 code in the -current > kernel. Hmmm... some time ago there was a port of NRL code to FreeBSD 2.1.x, I think. Does it mean someone from FreeBSD developers {is doing,has done} anything with this? Sincerely yours, --- Andrzej Bialecki FreeBSD: Turning PCs Into Workstations http://www.freebsd.org Research and Academic Network in Poland