From owner-freebsd-security Fri Dec 22 15:49:21 2000 From owner-freebsd-security@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Dec 22 15:49:18 2000 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-security@freebsd.org Received: from mercury.ccmr.cornell.edu (mercury.ccmr.cornell.edu [128.84.231.97]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7E21037B400 for ; Fri, 22 Dec 2000 15:49:17 -0800 (PST) Received: from ruby.ccmr.cornell.edu (IDENT:0@ruby.ccmr.cornell.edu [128.84.231.115]) by mercury.ccmr.cornell.edu (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id SAA23329; Fri, 22 Dec 2000 18:49:17 -0500 Received: from localhost (mitch@localhost) by ruby.ccmr.cornell.edu (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id SAA18617; Fri, 22 Dec 2000 18:49:15 -0500 X-Authentication-Warning: ruby.ccmr.cornell.edu: mitch owned process doing -bs Date: Fri, 22 Dec 2000 18:49:15 -0500 (EST) From: Mitch Collinsworth To: opentrax@email.com Cc: freebsd-security@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: ssh - are you nuts?!? In-Reply-To: <200012222337.PAA20885@spammie.svbug.com> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-security@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org > The question asked is: why you believe ssh is beter > than say telnet. Or what advantages SSH has in general. I think the expected advantages are well known. A better question might be "Are you suggesting ssh is no more secure than telnet and if so, why?" -Mitch To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-security" in the body of the message