From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jun 23 06:06:48 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1FFB3106564A for ; Mon, 23 Jun 2008 06:06:48 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from johans@stack.nl) Received: from mx1.stack.nl (meestal-mk5.stack.nl [IPv6:2001:610:1108:5010::149]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CE26D8FC1D for ; Mon, 23 Jun 2008 06:06:47 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from johans@stack.nl) Received: by mx1.stack.nl (Postfix, from userid 65534) id B83653FC50; Mon, 23 Jun 2008 08:06:46 +0200 (CEST) X-Spam-DCC: sonic.net: meestal-mk5.stack.nl 1156; Body=1 Fuz1=1 Fuz2=1 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.2.3 (2007-08-08) on meestal-mk5.stack.nl X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.6 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,NO_RELAYS autolearn=ham version=3.2.3 X-Spam-Relay-Country: Received: from mud.stack.nl (mud.stack.nl [IPv6:2001:610:1108:5011:2e0:81ff:fe03:c4bf]) by mx1.stack.nl (Postfix) with ESMTP id 97EA33FC34 for ; Mon, 23 Jun 2008 08:06:44 +0200 (CEST) Received: by mud.stack.nl (Postfix, from userid 801) id 74812B8B0; Mon, 23 Jun 2008 08:06:44 +0200 (CEST) Date: Mon, 23 Jun 2008 08:06:44 +0200 From: Johan van Selst To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20080623060644.GA81236@mud.stack.nl> References: <20080622152556.GA18003@sushi.pseudo.local> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha256; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="u3/rZRmxL6MmkK24" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20080622152556.GA18003@sushi.pseudo.local> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.17 (2007-11-30) Subject: Re: Why is security/pinentry not a dependency of security/gnupg X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 23 Jun 2008 06:06:48 -0000 --u3/rZRmxL6MmkK24 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Tobias Rehbein wrote: > Or is there some way to use gpg without pinentry? You could use security/gnupg1 instead (which is still developed, just a seperate branch), which doens't require pinentry. Ciao, Johan --u3/rZRmxL6MmkK24 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iEYEAREIAAYFAkhfPXIACgkQaOElK32lxTukOwCfU/m9w9nPN/XqqA5jrF2+7FjK fFIAoI8TrJo/GrTvzxV7Z5c5AgKUZzRL =XoK1 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --u3/rZRmxL6MmkK24--