From owner-freebsd-virtualization@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Feb 4 03:03:23 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-virtualization@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4CA2B12F for ; Tue, 4 Feb 2014 03:03:23 +0000 (UTC) Received: from plane.gmane.org (plane.gmane.org [80.91.229.3]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id F3CB11851 for ; Tue, 4 Feb 2014 03:03:22 +0000 (UTC) Received: from list by plane.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1WAWIC-0002wg-Vn for freebsd-virtualization@freebsd.org; Tue, 04 Feb 2014 04:03:20 +0100 Received: from tempe0.bbox.io ([24.249.180.233]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Tue, 04 Feb 2014 04:03:20 +0100 Received: from kevin.bowling by tempe0.bbox.io with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Tue, 04 Feb 2014 04:03:20 +0100 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ To: freebsd-virtualization@freebsd.org From: Kevin Bowling Subject: Re: using -virtualization@ as the preferred support channel for petitecloud? Date: Mon, 03 Feb 2014 20:03:09 -0700 Lines: 16 Message-ID: References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: tempe0.bbox.io User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:27.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/27.0 In-Reply-To: X-BeenThere: freebsd-virtualization@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17 Precedence: list List-Id: "Discussion of various virtualization techniques FreeBSD supports." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 04 Feb 2014 03:03:23 -0000 On 1/29/2014 8:07 PM, Aryeh Friedman wrote: > We are in the process of updating PetiteCloud.org in preparation for our > upcoming release of 0.2.3 (which will include support for Linux as a guest, > though still with FreeBSD as the only host and bhyve the only hypervisor > that currently runs in hardware virtualization mode). We're wondering if > it is ok if we update the resources page to say that all support questions > should go to -virtualization@? > > We've already been doing this unofficially for quite some time, and > PetiteCloud does not currently have a large enough user base to justify a > mailing list of its own. If/when questions about PetiteCloud become too > high volume here, we will then, of course, start our own mailing list. > I would greatly appreciate anything specific to your implementation on it's own list/forum/whatever.