From owner-freebsd-ruby@freebsd.org Wed Jun 28 15:41:59 2017 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ruby@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 626A6DA4A19 for ; Wed, 28 Jun 2017 15:41:59 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from idefix@fechner.net) Received: from mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (unknown [127.0.1.3]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3F9FC7D9CB for ; Wed, 28 Jun 2017 15:41:59 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from idefix@fechner.net) Received: by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) id 3EB41DA4A18; Wed, 28 Jun 2017 15:41:59 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: ruby@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3E4A4DA4A17 for ; Wed, 28 Jun 2017 15:41:59 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from idefix@fechner.net) Received: from anny.lostinspace.de (anny.lostinspace.de [IPv6:2001:608:a02::33]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E41777D9C9; Wed, 28 Jun 2017 15:41:58 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from idefix@fechner.net) Received: from server.idefix.lan (unknown [IPv6:2001:a61:129c:7801:dacb:8aff:febf:62dd]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: idefix@fechner.net) by anny.lostinspace.de (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 4DF6DC0E5CC; Wed, 28 Jun 2017 17:41:57 +0200 (CEST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=fechner.net; s=default; t=1498664517; bh=SHyWXRgdbQG1PcXGPsgZ4QrgzEh1FwfL7FXjIwh7hro=; h=Subject:To:References:From:Date:In-Reply-To; b=PV+TkcxyiW18TDHsEGIL1ixIPAzMQOJXlI1s2p5eNA3bObGlesEb1XD3QsC3Ec86A qME3jUQ50tGgZQ1YjBd00teHuP9euy1doNJP2f1uI6krah7zKXZeLJbqyv6Im958MQ 38L8gOaXy9UEMK+LyKlrW0ocD1CDch8OyHu7K9xU= Received: from [192.168.0.151] (aftr-88-217-181-241.dynamic.mnet-online.de [88.217.181.241]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by server.idefix.lan (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id ECDD3CD8806; Wed, 28 Jun 2017 17:41:55 +0200 (CEST) Subject: Re: Help needed: net/rubygem-grpc To: Steve Wills , Torsten Zuehlsdorff , ruby@freebsd.org References: <4474b97e-88ec-ead8-bb13-79e5889bf237@FreeBSD.org> From: Matthias Fechner Message-ID: Date: Wed, 28 Jun 2017 17:41:43 +0200 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; WOW64; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/52.2.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="bWsth0v1IVfUwrnPMCMsE2nsusIdH4u2b" X-BeenThere: freebsd-ruby@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: FreeBSD-specific Ruby discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 28 Jun 2017 15:41:59 -0000 This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 4880 and 3156) --bWsth0v1IVfUwrnPMCMsE2nsusIdH4u2b Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="pDLaR5iMgC3l4lpX9AUsMrlaa92vQfBf2"; protected-headers="v1" From: Matthias Fechner To: Steve Wills , Torsten Zuehlsdorff , ruby@freebsd.org Message-ID: Subject: Re: Help needed: net/rubygem-grpc References: <4474b97e-88ec-ead8-bb13-79e5889bf237@FreeBSD.org> In-Reply-To: --pDLaR5iMgC3l4lpX9AUsMrlaa92vQfBf2 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Language: en-US Hi Steve, Am 28.06.2017 um 04:14 schrieb Steve Wills: > I was taking a look at this. It looks like several things are going on.= > As you noticed, it's going to have to use gmake, you can patch the > extconf.rb for that. But then you run into other issues. It's expecting= > a pkg-config file for openssl, which we don't have for the openssl in > base (src). I think this is the only thing in base lacking a .pc file. > We will have to patch the Makefile for that. It would be best not to us= e > any of the bundled things and instead use the versions from ports. I > noticed there's a newer version, 1.4.0, but it has the same issues. Wil= l > the newer gitlab work with the 1.4.0 version of the grpc gem? regarding the comment here: https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitaly/issues/154#note_33314534 I think gitlab should work with version 1.4.0, but I think a test is alwa= ys a good idea. Gru=C3=9F Matthias --=20 "Programming today is a race between software engineers striving to build bigger and better idiot-proof programs, and the universe trying to produce bigger and better idiots. So far, the universe is winning." -- Rich Cook --pDLaR5iMgC3l4lpX9AUsMrlaa92vQfBf2-- --bWsth0v1IVfUwrnPMCMsE2nsusIdH4u2b Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2 iEYEARECAAYFAllTzkEACgkQkZS/qRt1bvaR4gCghk6HGrpwZFqqRQigLPsL10qK b3IAoMQee8n7XIVoi93pJLcz4g08w6uY =ltDS -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --bWsth0v1IVfUwrnPMCMsE2nsusIdH4u2b--