From owner-freebsd-hackers  Fri Mar 15 09:35:00 1996
Return-Path: owner-hackers
Received: (from root@localhost)
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.3/8.7.3) id JAA13950
          for hackers-outgoing; Fri, 15 Mar 1996 09:35:00 -0800 (PST)
Received: from tfs.com (tfs.com [140.145.250.1])
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.3/8.7.3) with SMTP id JAA13936
          for <hackers@freebsd.org>; Fri, 15 Mar 1996 09:34:56 -0800 (PST)
Received: from critter.tfs.com by tfs.com (smail3.1.28.1) with SMTP
	id m0txdOw-0003weC; Fri, 15 Mar 96 09:34 PST
Received: from localhost.tfs.com (localhost.tfs.com [127.0.0.1]) by critter.tfs.com (8.6.12/8.6.12) with SMTP id RAA27742; Fri, 15 Mar 1996 17:34:49 GMT
X-Authentication-Warning: critter.tfs.com: Host localhost.tfs.com didn't use HELO protocol
To: John Fieber <jfieber@indiana.edu>
cc: "Eric L. Hernes" <erich@lodgenet.com>, hackers@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: new malloc/libc... 
In-reply-to: Your message of "Fri, 15 Mar 1996 12:26:22 EST."
             <Pine.BSF.3.91.960315121150.2008F-100000@fieber-john.campusview.indiana.edu> 
Date: Fri, 15 Mar 1996 17:34:48 +0000
Message-ID: <27740.826911288@critter.tfs.com>
From: Poul-Henning Kamp <phk@critter.tfs.com>
Sender: owner-hackers@freebsd.org
X-Loop: FreeBSD.org
Precedence: bulk

> > Has anyone on the core team talked to Xinside about this?
> > They said that you (core) were working on it.  If it's just
> > a matter of -lgnumalloc, or -lphkmalloc (which isn't in 2.1 in
> > any way shape or form right?) then it seems that they could just
> > use a better malloc and release it right?
> 
> Or, is there any more specific info on nature of the leak?  I compiled

I have contacted Xinside and will look at the problem.

--
Poul-Henning Kamp           | phk@FreeBSD.ORG       FreeBSD Core-team.
http://www.freebsd.org/~phk | phk@login.dknet.dk    Private mailbox.
whois: [PHK]                | phk@ref.tfs.com       TRW Financial Systems, Inc.
Future will arrive by its own means, progress not so.