From owner-cvs-ports@FreeBSD.ORG  Wed Nov 30 09:35:28 2011
Return-Path: <owner-cvs-ports@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: cvs-ports@FreeBSD.org
Received: by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix, from userid 1033)
	id BE4DF106566B; Wed, 30 Nov 2011 09:35:28 +0000 (UTC)
Date: Wed, 30 Nov 2011 09:35:28 +0000
From: Alexey Dokuchaev <danfe@FreeBSD.org>
To: Pav Lucistnik <pav@FreeBSD.org>
Message-ID: <20111130093528.GA7901@FreeBSD.org>
References: <201111292232.pATMWINp021704@repoman.freebsd.org>
	<20111130015504.GB3953@FreeBSD.org>
	<20111130090313.00003930@unknown>
	<20111130080947.GA95193@FreeBSD.org> <4ED5F0CA.9010504@FreeBSD.org>
	<20111130091253.GB4340@FreeBSD.org> <4ED5F505.5070104@FreeBSD.org>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=koi8-r
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <4ED5F505.5070104@FreeBSD.org>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.1i
Cc: cvs-ports@FreeBSD.org, ports-committers@FreeBSD.org, cvs-all@FreeBSD.org,
	Pawe? P?kala <pawel@FreeBSD.org>
Subject: Re: cvs commit: ports/x11-fonts Makefile
	ports/x11-fonts/anonymousPro Makefile distinfo pkg-descr
	pkg-plist ports/x11-fonts/anonymousPro/files pkg-message.in
X-BeenThere: cvs-ports@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: CVS commit messages for the ports tree <cvs-ports.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/cvs-ports>,
	<mailto:cvs-ports-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/cvs-ports>
List-Post: <mailto:cvs-ports@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:cvs-ports-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/cvs-ports>,
	<mailto:cvs-ports-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 30 Nov 2011 09:35:28 -0000

On Wed, Nov 30, 2011 at 10:19:01AM +0100, Pav Lucistnik wrote:
> On 2011/11/30 10:12, Alexey Dokuchaev wrote:
> >Seriously, you really think that e.g. `audio/deadbeef' port (and plethora 
> >of others) should be named `audio/deaDBeeF' (official name is DeaDBeeF)?
> >
> >(In case of DeaDBeeF I do not consider this name stupid at all.  It just
> >does not fit as is into ports collection.)
> 
> Since it is the official capitalization used by vendor, I would not 
> oppose audio/deaDBeeF neither audio/DeaDBeeF (preferred).

But first letter should be lowercase, no? (yes, pun intended). :-)

Pav, ports collection constitutes some ten years of maintaining open source
software (largely diverse), and I do not think that we should either
strictly adhere to any policy or ignore it.  Natural evolution of all those
little things, names included, is very important indicator of what our
community feels (in its majority) about the way things should be carried
out.  What you seem to suggest goes against observable traditions and does
not help to improve anything in any way.

(Frankly, I still don't believe you're being serious here.)

./danfe