From owner-freebsd-current Fri Sep 24 9:11:51 1999 Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from gratis.grondar.za (gratis.grondar.za [196.7.18.133]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DB58B1558C for ; Fri, 24 Sep 1999 09:11:36 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from mark@grondar.za) Received: from grondar.za (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by gratis.grondar.za (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id SAA92080; Fri, 24 Sep 1999 18:11:02 +0200 (SAST) (envelope-from mark@grondar.za) Message-Id: <199909241611.SAA92080@gratis.grondar.za> To: John Polstra Cc: current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: On hub.freebsd.org refusing to talk to dialups Date: Fri, 24 Sep 1999 18:11:02 +0200 From: Mark Murray Sender: owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG > These days the RBL is more of a preventative measure than a blocking > measure. It has already forced most open relays to tighten up. I'll go with that. The DUL stops _huge_ amounts of "drive-by" spam, though... M -- Mark Murray Join the anti-SPAM movement: http://www.cauce.org To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message