Date: Mon, 11 Aug 2003 19:11:47 +0200 From: "Simon L. Nielsen" <simon@FreeBSD.org> To: Tom Rhodes <trhodes@FreeBSD.org> Cc: FreeBSD-doc@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: -doc/bugs issue/question Message-ID: <20030811171145.GB636@FreeBSD.org> In-Reply-To: <20030811125419.266958a0.trhodes@FreeBSD.org> References: <20030811125419.266958a0.trhodes@FreeBSD.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
--RnlQjJ0d97Da+TV1 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On 2003.08.11 12:54:19 -0400, Tom Rhodes wrote: > Many people submit patches in their PRs; however, many of them are > not applied because they are submitted for a stable branch and > many developers simply lack the time to merge it into current. >=20 > Perhaps in our PR/bugs documentation, we could recommend that: >=20 > A patch against the CURRENT or HEAD CVS branch is preffered since > all new code should be applied and tested first. After perhaps : all new code in FreeBSD should be applied and tested in the CURRENT branch = first. > appropriate or substational testing has been done, the code will > be merged/migrated to the STABLE branch. >=20 > What is the general opinion of the -doc team on this? Sounds like a good idea to me. The more help we can give people to make better PR's, the better. --=20 Simon L. Nielsen FreeBSD Documentation Team --RnlQjJ0d97Da+TV1 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.2 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQE/N85Rh9pcDSc1mlERAjm4AKCszazMfA1Sel05bZ3l01pZj0mT/QCgyL/f jlbcaDXZYwp8nt4X5+AuOqY= =EeCA -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --RnlQjJ0d97Da+TV1--
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20030811171145.GB636>