From owner-freebsd-cluster Thu Mar 28 11:25:46 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-cluster@freebsd.org Received: from acl.lanl.gov (acl.lanl.gov [128.165.147.1]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 8F58137B416 for ; Thu, 28 Mar 2002 11:25:43 -0800 (PST) Received: (qmail 904468 invoked from network); 28 Mar 2002 12:25:42 -0700 Received: from snaresland.acl.lanl.gov (128.165.147.113) by acl.lanl.gov with SMTP; 28 Mar 2002 12:25:42 -0700 Received: (qmail 2352 invoked by uid 3499); 28 Mar 2002 12:25:42 -0700 Received: from localhost (sendmail-bs@127.0.0.1) by localhost with SMTP; 28 Mar 2002 12:25:42 -0700 Date: Thu, 28 Mar 2002 12:25:42 -0700 (MST) From: Ronald G Minnich X-X-Sender: To: Alexey Koptsevich Cc: Subject: Re: task distribution with checkpointing In-Reply-To: Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-cluster@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG On Thu, 28 Mar 2002, Alexey Koptsevich wrote: > Does your port support checkpointing? Are sources still available and > expected to work under modern FreeBSD? our port did everything. It is lost in the mists of time. We sent it to the condor team years ago and I guess they lost it. > I tried to install last version of Linux Condor under FreeBSD, > unsuccessfully. Do you think that FreeBSD Linux emulation is able to run > Condor with checkpointing (and thus I should be persistent), or it is not > mature enough for that? It really should work, but ... oh well. ron To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-cluster" in the body of the message