From owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jul 28 14:52:01 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8808916A503; Fri, 28 Jul 2006 14:52:01 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from mux@freebsd.org) Received: from elvis.mu.org (elvis.mu.org [192.203.228.196]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F1F2043D69; Fri, 28 Jul 2006 14:51:57 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from mux@freebsd.org) Received: by elvis.mu.org (Postfix, from userid 1920) id 6DEEE1A4E7E; Fri, 28 Jul 2006 07:51:57 -0700 (PDT) Date: Fri, 28 Jul 2006 16:51:57 +0200 From: Maxime Henrion To: maksim yevmenkin Message-ID: <20060728145157.GA8070@elvis.mu.org> References: <1153997829.12770@origin.intron.ac> <864px31eyz.fsf@xps.des.no> <86psfryvvo.fsf@xps.des.no> <44C8CFA2.3000400@savvis.net> <868xme28nt.fsf@xps.des.no> <44C90D22.5010607@savvis.net> <86slkmzx4o.fsf@xps.des.no> <20060728113705.GZ8070@elvis.mu.org> <44CA226B.1030608@savvis.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <44CA226B.1030608@savvis.net> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.1i Cc: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org, re@freebsd.org Subject: Re: How to Use ddb(4)? X-BeenThere: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Technical Discussions relating to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 28 Jul 2006 14:52:01 -0000 maksim yevmenkin wrote: > Maxime Henrion wrote: > >Dag-Erling Sm?rgrav wrote: > >>Maksim Yevmenkin writes: > >>>so far i only got one (successful) report. would people please give > >>>it a try to see if work, so i can commit it. > >>Please commit it. I don't see how it can do any harm. > > > >Yes please; I'd like to see this patch in HEAD as soon as possible so > >that we can have as much coverage as possible since this is the kind of > >fix that will be very desirable to MFC for 6.2-RELEASE. > > patch was committed to head yesterday. Yeah, I just saw it, I was quite behind with my mail. Thanks! > >BTW, does your patch also fix similar problems with kbdmux(4) and the > >geli mountroot prompt? > > yes, it should. please let me know if you still have this kind of > problems with kbdmux(4) and atkbd(4) Great. I haven't had the time to look at the patch yet, but can you foresee any problem with MFC'ing it or would you consider it safe? Cheers, Maxime