From owner-freebsd-ports Thu Jun 5 13:56:31 1997 Return-Path: Received: (from root@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) id NAA06663 for ports-outgoing; Thu, 5 Jun 1997 13:56:31 -0700 (PDT) Received: from ingenieria ([168.176.15.11]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) with SMTP id NAA06632; Thu, 5 Jun 1997 13:56:04 -0700 (PDT) Received: by ingenieria (SMI-8.6/SMI-SVR4) id QAA01783; Thu, 5 Jun 1997 16:42:33 -0400 Date: Thu, 5 Jun 1997 16:42:33 -0400 (EDT) From: Pedro Giffuni To: Satoshi Asami cc: asami@FreeBSD.org, freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: ports/2379 In-Reply-To: <199706032343.QAA03360@freefall.freebsd.org> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-ports@FreeBSD.org X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk Satoshi; Honestly, I didn't port this, I lost my port and it was also a mess, so I didn't take the time to fix it after I saw this one. Yes, NetPBM is a dependency, and there is also support for many other graphic devices (including NCSA telnet and TIFF) that work, but had to be activated in the configuration file. I remember this is a very useful port, but the original porter made some desesperate scripts I didn't like. I'll take a look later and see what can be done. Pedro. On Tue, 3 Jun 1997, Satoshi Asami wrote: > Synopsis: New URT port > > State-Changed-From-To: open-closed > State-Changed-By: asami > State-Changed-When: Tue Jun 3 16:43:08 PDT 1997 > State-Changed-Why: > > Thanks, committed. I made so many changes so I'm not going > to include the diff here. > > By the way, should I add netpbm to RUN_DEPENDS too? >