From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Jul 10 09:00:45 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B6934106566B for ; Sat, 10 Jul 2010 09:00:45 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from lars@e.0x20.net) Received: from mail.0x20.net (mail.0x20.net [217.69.67.217]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 71CB28FC0A for ; Sat, 10 Jul 2010 09:00:45 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail.0x20.net (Postfix, from userid 1002) id 978A13A61E; Sat, 10 Jul 2010 11:00:38 +0200 (CEST) Date: Sat, 10 Jul 2010 11:00:38 +0200 From: Lars Engels To: Dominic Fandrey Message-ID: <20100710090038.GB16045@e.0x20.net> References: <4C374B3E.90704@bsdforen.de> <20100709172503.GA22795@charon.picobyte.net> <4C375E47.9020307@bsdforen.de> <20100709200016.GA23404@charon.picobyte.net> <4C378BB5.2080206@bsdforen.de> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="opJtzjQTFsWo+cga" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <4C378BB5.2080206@bsdforen.de> X-Editor: VIM - Vi IMproved 7.2 X-Operation-System: FreeBSD 5.5-RELEASE-p19 User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14) Cc: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org, Shaun Amott Subject: Re: Solutions for the PR load problem X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 10 Jul 2010 09:00:45 -0000 --opJtzjQTFsWo+cga Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Fri, Jul 09, 2010 at 10:51:01PM +0200, Dominic Fandrey wrote: > On 09/07/2010 22:00, Shaun Amott wrote: > >=20 > > I'm not sure how many non-committers were aware of / given access to tb3 > > and tb4 when they were around, but if tinderbox were used as a matter of > > course, it would, I believe go some way to speeding things up. > >=20 >=20 > So if I set up a private tinderbox and provide amd64 and i386 > 6-/7-/8-stable logs with every PR I submit it would hasten the > processing of my PRs? The more complex a port is and the more dependencies it has the more work a committer has to check if the PR is error-free. Having TB-Logs would prove that the port builds fine, and the PR is more likely to be taken. It's also better for the submitter as he can see if he has made any errors. --opJtzjQTFsWo+cga Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (FreeBSD) iEYEARECAAYFAkw4NrYACgkQKc512sD3aficAQCeLJYsO2zaeYbLQsQgiD50QBD4 trgAnjKKnAvIXDduWHp90RirVXgfXu6j =ShvY -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --opJtzjQTFsWo+cga--