Date: Thu, 1 Jul 2004 02:16:00 +0900 (JST) From: Norikatsu Shigemura <nork@FreeBSD.org> To: Peter Pentchev <roam@ringlet.net> Cc: ports@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: rcNG-fy sysutils/daemontools Message-ID: <200406301716.i5UHFxsY040146@sakura.ninth-nine.com> In-Reply-To: <20040630161000.GB979@straylight.m.ringlet.net> References: <20040620070446.21a599c7.nork@FreeBSD.org> <20040622183550.GI46866@hal9000.halplant.com> <20040624151543.5cadaf83.nork@FreeBSD.org> <20040625162008.GC51175@hal9000.halplant.com> <20040629205443.638a0b27.nork@FreeBSD.org> <200406301408.i5UE8NGf044132@sakura.ninth-nine.com> <20040630161000.GB979@straylight.m.ringlet.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Wed, 30 Jun 2004 19:10:00 +0300 Peter Pentchev <roam@ringlet.net> wrote: > On Wed, Jun 30, 2004 at 11:08:29PM +0900, Norikatsu Shigemura wrote: > > Hi roam! > > Please update daemontools with following patch:-). > Ahh.. daemon(8) would indeed be a good idea :) > However, I wonder about moving the 2>&1 to the end of the shell command. > IMHO, part of its purpose (or part of the purpose of the original |& csh > construct) is to make sure that anything svscan outputs on stderr is > picked up by readproctitle on stdin. Moving the 2>&1 to the end of the > line would make it apply to readproctitle, not svscan, and any error > messages emitted from svscan would be lost, which kind of defeats the > purpose of executing readproctitle at all :) Oops, I considered that stderr and stdout's streams should be gone to readproctitle with my this way. Sorry I missed, please feel free.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?200406301716.i5UHFxsY040146>