From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Mar 20 17:24:42 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F1ECC1065688 for ; Fri, 20 Mar 2009 17:24:42 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from stefan.lambrev@moneybookers.com) Received: from blah.sun-fish.com (blah.sun-fish.com [217.18.249.150]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6F2938FC2D for ; Fri, 20 Mar 2009 17:24:42 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from stefan.lambrev@moneybookers.com) Received: by blah.sun-fish.com (Postfix, from userid 1002) id 8FFD51B13960; Fri, 20 Mar 2009 18:24:41 +0100 (CET) X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.2.5 (2008-06-10) on malcho.cmotd.com X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-10.6 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,BAYES_00, HTML_MESSAGE autolearn=ham version=3.2.5 Received: from hater.cmotd.com (hater.cmotd.com [192.168.3.125]) by blah.sun-fish.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id CEFBE1B13916; Fri, 20 Mar 2009 18:24:38 +0100 (CET) Message-Id: From: Stefan Lambrev To: Pete French In-Reply-To: Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v930.3) Date: Fri, 20 Mar 2009 19:24:38 +0200 References: X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.930.3) X-Virus-Scanned: ClamAV 0.94/9145/Fri Mar 20 15:59:16 2009 on blah.cmotd.com X-Virus-Status: Clean Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed; delsp=yes Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Cc: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: gemor mirror and priority X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 20 Mar 2009 17:24:43 -0000 Thanks for the patch. I'll try it and report after the weekend :) On Mar 20, 2009, at 7:11 PM, Pete French wrote: >> If it can apply to 7-stable or 7.1-release I'll be even grateful to >> have it ;) > > Find it here: http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=123630 > > That was relative to 7.0 - I havent tried it on 7.1. I was hopinh > that the changes would be incorporated, but pjd didn't like the > solution > and said he would prefer it if someone extended the configure sub- > command to > change disc priorities in an existing config. I didn't have time to do > do that thought (and I dont like that as a solution, as it means > changing > the array priorities rather than having fixed ones and changing > which is > used - I think we should have both). > > One day, when I get some time, I will have another look at it. > > -pete. -- Best Wishes, Stefan Lambrev ICQ# 24134177