From owner-freebsd-security Tue Mar 26 15:16:39 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-security@freebsd.org Received: from lothlorien.tangledhelix.net (lothlorien.tangledhelix.net [198.88.76.131]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4E9D937B400 for ; Tue, 26 Mar 2002 15:16:35 -0800 (PST) Received: (from dan@localhost) by lothlorien.tangledhelix.net id g2QNGYG00933 for freebsd-security@freebsd.org; Tue, 26 Mar 2002 18:16:34 -0500 (EST) Date: Tue, 26 Mar 2002 18:16:34 -0500 From: Dan Lowe To: freebsd-security@freebsd.org Subject: Re: It's time for those 2048-, 3072-, and 4096-bit keys? Message-ID: <20020326181634.A919@lothlorien.tangledhelix.net> Reply-To: dan@tangledhelix.com Mail-Followup-To: freebsd-security@freebsd.org References: <20020326185714.F22539@mail.webmonster.de> <20020326182003.F15545-100000@patrocles.silby.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5i In-Reply-To: <20020326182003.F15545-100000@patrocles.silby.com>; from silby@silby.com on Tue, Mar 26, 2002 at 06:26:14PM -0600 Sender: owner-freebsd-security@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Previously, Mike Silbersack wrote: > > Yes, upgrading clients to v2 would be best. However, I don't think that > locking out v1 users would be the best way to achieve that. The most > likely result of doing so would be people falling back to telnet. On a system where security is of any concern whatsoever, why would telnet be available in the first place? -- Beware! To touch these wires is instant death. Anyone found doing so will be prosecuted. -Sign at a railroad station To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-security" in the body of the message