From owner-freebsd-hackers Thu Dec 3 11:31:38 1998 Return-Path: Received: (from majordom@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id LAA12090 for freebsd-hackers-outgoing; Thu, 3 Dec 1998 11:31:38 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG) Received: from mail.gtn.com (mail.gtn.com [192.109.159.3]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id LAA12083 for ; Thu, 3 Dec 1998 11:31:27 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from andreas@klemm.gtn.com) Received: (from uucp@localhost) by mail.gtn.com (8.8.6/8.8.6) with UUCP id UAA26842; Thu, 3 Dec 1998 20:30:07 +0100 (MET) Received: (from andreas@localhost) by klemm.gtn.com (8.9.1/8.9.1) id UAA15163; Thu, 3 Dec 1998 20:16:09 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from andreas) Message-ID: <19981203201608.A14870@klemm.gtn.com> Date: Thu, 3 Dec 1998 20:16:08 +0100 From: Andreas Klemm To: Guido van Rooij , "Jordan K. Hubbard" Cc: Eivind Eklund , hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Can we just come to a decision on IPv6 and IPSec? References: <19981203002629.A26879@klemm.gtn.com> <9834.912642230@zippy.cdrom.com> <19981203085302.B1209@klemm.gtn.com> <19981203191210.B28037@gvr.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Mailer: Mutt 0.93.2i In-Reply-To: <19981203191210.B28037@gvr.org>; from Guido van Rooij on Thu, Dec 03, 1998 at 07:12:10PM +0100 X-Disclaimer: A free society is one where it is safe to be unpopular X-Operating-System: FreeBSD 3.0-CURRENT SMP Sender: owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG On Thu, Dec 03, 1998 at 07:12:10PM +0100, Guido van Rooij wrote: > > Fully agreed. Fortunately KAME is available for -current as well. > > Where did you find that? I only saw 2.2.7 stacks. Sh.., you're right, I browsed too quickly over the paragraph yesterday evening. It's only available for 2.2.7, and therefor Jordan pointed out, that this is a real disadvantage for 3.0, which is the future... But from the Webserver: We have chosen 2.2.x-RELEASE because: - it is excellent for daily use. - well-maintained "ports" tree helps us modify applications to support IPv6. - and 3.0-current is too hard to track if we maintain cvs repository ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ separately. ^^^^^^^^^^ What does that mean ? And if not ?? If they would / could commit their developement to the -current tree and merge stable stuff to RELENG_2_2 ?! -- Andreas Klemm http://www.FreeBSD.ORG/~andreas What gives you 90% more speed, for example, in kernel compilation ? http://www.FreeBSD.ORG/~fsmp/SMP/akgraph-a/graph1.html "NT = Not Today" (Maggie Biggs) ``powered by FreeBSD SMP'' To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message