From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG  Wed Jun 20 08:54:38 2012
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 59EFC106566C
	for <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>;
	Wed, 20 Jun 2012 08:54:38 +0000 (UTC)
	(envelope-from wojtek@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl)
Received: from wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl (wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl [89.206.35.99])
	by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B947F8FC0C
	for <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>;
	Wed, 20 Jun 2012 08:54:37 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id q5K8sZce023417;
	Wed, 20 Jun 2012 10:54:35 +0200 (CEST)
	(envelope-from wojtek@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl)
Received: from localhost (wojtek@localhost)
	by wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl (8.14.5/8.14.5/Submit) with ESMTP id
	q5K8sZDI023414; Wed, 20 Jun 2012 10:54:35 +0200 (CEST)
	(envelope-from wojtek@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl)
Date: Wed, 20 Jun 2012 10:54:35 +0200 (CEST)
From: Wojciech Puchar <wojtek@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl>
To: Volodymyr Kostyrko <c.kworr@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <4FE189D9.4040404@gmail.com>
Message-ID: <alpine.BSF.2.00.1206201051250.23394@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl>
References: <402199FE-380B-41B6-866B-7D5D66C457D5@lpthe.jussieu.fr>
	<CAH3a3KWKNF5Bt-8=KgtbMh=rV6GfUO7OaeE6-SutxkcRe8cG3Q@mail.gmail.com>
	<alpine.BSF.2.00.1206191953280.8234@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl>
	<20120619205225.21d6709f.freebsd@edvax.de>
	<alpine.BSF.2.00.1206192154110.98802@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl>
	<CAGwOe2bSwAp5jfaQstYY+LmjjXNx31JW+gRTo3_KLYdYrqHC_w@mail.gmail.com>
	<alpine.BSF.2.00.1206200823060.71457@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl>
	<4FE189D9.4040404@gmail.com>
User-Agent: Alpine 2.00 (BSF 1167 2008-08-23)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed
X-Greylist: Sender passed SPF test, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.2.7
	(wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl [127.0.0.1]);
	Wed, 20 Jun 2012 10:54:35 +0200 (CEST)
Cc: Polytropon <freebsd@edvax.de>,
	FreeBSD Questions <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>,
	=?ISO-8859-15?Q?Fernando_Apestegu=EDa?= <fernando.apesteguia@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: Why Clang
X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: User questions <freebsd-questions.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions>, 
	<mailto:freebsd-questions-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-questions>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-questions-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions>, 
	<mailto:freebsd-questions-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 20 Jun 2012 08:54:38 -0000

>
> The bad thing about GPLv3 is that if anyone commits any code under this 
> license into the tree vendors that use our code base for making their own 
> OSes will ditch FreeBSD as they can be sued by FSF. Juniper for example. It 
> would be wise to listen to their point of view on GPLv3.

not really understood this.

--------
if anyone commits any code under this
license into the tree
--------
into what tree? gcc tree or FreeBSD tree?

FreeBSD has it's own copy of gcc so any change in gcc doesn't 
automatically change FreeBSD code and licencing.

Can you explain it more precisely privately? thanks


> FreeBSD is heading the right way: bringing BSD toolchain to the world and 
> fixing world compilation with gcc46 from ports would give anyone a choice on 
> which compiler to use keeping GPL out of tree.

the right way is to use best performing tools as long as no law problems 
exist.